June 2013 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Kokane has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

October 2013 edit

  Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Kokane. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. STATic message me! 15:58, 24 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Kokane. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. STATic message me! 22:32, 24 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.  Mark Arsten (talk) 04:06, 25 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Mark Arsten, this issue must be resolved immediately. User:STATicVapor has created a serious situation, regarding the information on Kokane. The information is false and inaccurate. Having this invalid information on article Kokane is sabotage to his name, career, and business. We asked that User:STATicVapor cease to edit and revise article Kokane. User:RashaadGold must be allowed to FIX the incorrect information on article Kokane or you must remove all information pertaining to the artist Kokane from the Wikipedia site due to defamation of character. My sources are Kokane(actual artist) and his website www.budeboyent.com If you need any proof, contact the artist directly.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kokane

Regards,

 Son of Kokane
  • Hi, I'm sorry if there is inaccurate information, but I blocked you per this edit since we do not allow threats of legal action here. If you'd like to disavow that threat, I will unblock you. If you are unblocked, I would strongly suggest discussing the issue on the article's talk page or WP:BLPN instead of directly editing the article, per our WP:COI policy. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:18, 25 October 2013 (UTC)Reply
Please explain how the current article is defamation in any way? The article can not be a unsourced promotional WP:SOAPBOX like you want it to be. The article has been the way it is for years and there is nothing negative, incorrect or slanderous about it, and if there is explain it and I would be glad to change it. STATic message me! 17:50, 25 October 2013 (UTC)Reply