Rarecpus

Welcome!

Hello, Rarecpus, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Rare CPUs, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! —Largo Plazo (talk) 08:35, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Rare CPUs

A tag has been placed on Rare CPUs, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. —Largo Plazo (talk) 08:35, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

December 2008

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Rare CPUs. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. Dekisugi (talk) 08:51, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Rare CPUs. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —Largo Plazo (talk) 09:22, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Rare CPUs

An article that you have been involved in editing, Rare CPUs, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rare CPUs. Thank you. —Largo Plazo (talk) 19:47, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

January 2009

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Rare CPUs. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. Thank you. —Largo Plazo (talk) 18:01, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Rarecpus for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. —Largo Plazo (talk) 18:18, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Whether you knew it was not acceptable or not, performing the same actions logged in and logged out isn't on. When your block expires, please don't continue to disrupt the AFD; consider contributing to the discussion instead. If the IP address you were using resumes disruption, I'll have to block this account and the IP both. If you'd like advice on how to contribute constructively to a deletion discussion, let me (or anyone else) know. --barneca (talk) 22:56, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to User talk:Largoplazo. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. —Largo Plazo (talk) 20:23, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. ... discospinster _talk 20:32, 2 January 2009 (UTC)