Randimason
Welcome!
Welcome! (We can't say that loud/big enough!)
Here are a few links you might find helpful:
- Be Bold!
- Don't let grumpy users scare you off.
- Meet other new users
- Learn from others
- Play nice with others
- Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
- Tell us about you
You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.
If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page.
We're so glad you're here! If you need help or just want to say hello, click here and leave a message! [1] -- Phgao 12:50, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I saw you removed the Orphan tag. You are right that there are many links to other articles, but the orphan tag is actually for incoming links from other Wikipedia articles. So, I added the tag back. Over time, more articles will link to the page, and the tag can be removed. Hope you understand. Cheers, Ocaasi t | c 22:15, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
PRSA edit
Even after weeding out the negative media sources I would portray as more of a "reaction" than a genuine piece of fact-based journalism, I'm not entirely happy with the balance of the PRSA article, but I included all that I could find appropriate sources for. If someone at PRSA was willing to share independent sources that cover its history, advocacy, code of ethics, etc. in depth, it would be immensely helpful if you choose to do so. Corporate Minion 17:17, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Public Relations Journal for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Public Relations Journal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Public Relations Journal until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. CorporateM (Talk) 16:47, 3 January 2013 (UTC)