Radioactive afikomen

Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits. Readers looking for serious articles will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you can write whatever you want. You might also want to check out Uncyclopedia.

Evangelion characters article

Radioactive, since you've become an active editor to this article, I thought I'd contact you directly about this issue. Do you agree with the action that I propose? Please get back to me. Willbyr (talk | contribs) 04:46, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

A new Genesis

Radioactive afikomen, will you join us in creating a new Genesis for Mankind? --Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici 23:39, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Angel spectrometer analysis (NGE).jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Angel spectrometer analysis (NGE).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 08:58, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Angel spectrometer analysis (NGE).jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Angel spectrometer analysis (NGE).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:07, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

• Concur with BetacommandBot. Please see User_talk:Betacommand#Bothersome_Bot. --Durin 13:20, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Evangelion: Drive to Good Article status

I've been being a little slow about this, but (check the project page) we need to start brushing up the Evangelion articles to the point that they are "Good Article" status (it doesn't matter if they get Featured or something, just that they're good enough that they theoretically could be at that standard). This means making sure that they are EXACTLY in accordance with all of wikipedia's rules and regulations (i.e. gutting them of all of our own Analysis; i.e. on the episode articles and Angel names and such). This doesn't actually concern me that much. (What are you planning Ikari?--Keel) --Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici 20:58, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:IMG 0699.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:IMG 0699.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:38, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Images in Evangelion articles

As a signed-on participant of WikiProject Evangelion, I think we need to talk about the future of the images in the articles. Your input on the issue at the project's talk page is appreciated. Willbyr (talk | contribs) 03:54, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Eva 1.0 article

Hi, I'm copy-pasting this image to all you members in the Evangelion workgroup, since there seems to be no communication/to-do template in your workgroup yet (not sure if I have the time to join myself yet). The article on the newest movie needs serious help, particularly in converting listcruft to prose. Note that you may expose yourself to some spoilers if you choose to help. Evangelion: 1.0 You Are (Not) Alone. --GunnarRene 14:37, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Spooky

I'm here too.

WOOOO!

--Wikinterpreter (talk) 22:48, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

This page needs more goat! Huw Powell (talk) 21:00, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

o hai --₪Ryan Taylor₪^talk 00:42, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

A small request

Hi Radioactive afikomen, our paths have never crossed, so please excuse this intrusion. Would you reconsider the use of the word "stalk" in your signature line? There are some editors here who have had real-life experience with being stalked as a result of their work here at Wikipedia, and some of them find it offensive to see that word used in a casual or humorous manner. It's just a suggestion, made after I asked another editor a similar favour and he did some research to see how many other talk/stalk signature lines were in use on Wikipedia. Feel free to contact me if you are concerned about this request. Thanks, Risker (talk) 17:41, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

You mean I'm not the only one who thought of the talk/stalk thing? Dang. And here I was thinking I was clever.

Anyways, with regards to the wording at issue, I have rectified that. Is the change satisfactory? Radioactive afikomen 22:36, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

That's great! Thanks very much for being so considerate. It's a sad thing to have to admit that some of our peers have had such difficult experiences because of their activities here. Risker (talk) 22:39, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Policy bitch on steroids strikes again!

Hey RA! I don't mean to be anal or anything but your sig is in violation of the WP username policy. Transclusion is not allowed, to hard on the database and a target for vandalism. Goatspeed! -IcĕwedgЁ (ťalķ) 08:53, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

EL are frowned upon as well, much as I approve, you should probably remove that too. -IcĕwedgЁ (ťalķ) 08:56, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

I have kidnapped your Princess...

— ラビット The Black Rabbit of Inlé_{(She is really really annoying...)}

Oh, that's okay. You can keep her. Radioactive afikomen 09:34, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Have also kidnapped your alarm clock. — ラビット The Black Rabbit of Inlé_{(It is slightly less annoying)}

No. I have kidnapped your alarm clock. This lagomorphic upstart is a damnable liar! But your princess is merely in another castle... --File:Flag of Soviet Canuckistan.svgYossarian^Complaints 17:09, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Maybe he had two alarm clocks?</perplexed> — ラビット The Black Rabbit of Inlé_{(Not like preplexed. That's different.)}

I hope you didn't take my broken alarm clock; there's no way to shut it off. Are you really good at ignoring an obnoxious "BEEP-BEEP-BEEP-BEEP" sound? Radioactive afikomen 05:44, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

OH GOD THE PAIN! --File:Flag of Soviet Canuckistan.svgYossarian^Complaints 11:09, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

Serves you right for stealing another person's alarm clock. Radioactive afikomen 05:23, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

You should make him watch Night of the Lepus as punishment. Hellbus (talk) 11:35, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Giant wabbits for the win! ^_^ — ラビット The Black Rabbit of Inlé_{(I am the Black Rabbit of Something, and I approve this message)}

Is it me or are our signatures... quite messy, all together like this? You both had much nicer ones on RW. (Hellbus is excused from this harsh judgement) — ラビット The Black Rabbit of Inlé_{(Star Time 2!)}

It's true, Rabbit: you have horrible taste in signatures.  : D Radioactive afikomen 22:20, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Cheek! *slaps you with glove*

Mine is quite reserved, by my standards. Yours is orange and blue, for Christ's sake. — ラビット The Black Rabbit of Inlé_{(Orange and blue!)}

That's funny, I seem to recall you saying you liked mine. Radioactive afikomen 00:34, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

I do, but put next to mine and Yossie's, it makes the page look like a carnival. — ラビット The Black Rabbit of Inlé_{(Why isn't there a Star Time 1? Why???)}

Yay! Carnivals are fun. Hellbus (talk) 02:33, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

this:

MINE.
Got it? — ラビット The Black Rabbit of Inlé₍₎ 13:06, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Awfully territorial for a rabbit, aren't you? Radioactive afikomen 03:03, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Shall I take that as a yes? — ラビット The Black Rabbit of Inlé₍₎ 18:04, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

...Maybe.  : ) Radioactive afikomen 04:45, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

You might like this userbox...

{{User:ParisianBlade/Conservapedia}}

This user believes that Conservapedia is about as trustworthy as North Korea is democratic.

KMFDM FAN (talk) 19:49, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Ah, thanks, KMFDM. Say, how did you know I had anything to do with Conservapedia—are you a RationalWikian? Radioactive afikomen 04:00, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Your yellow box on your userpage links "fatal tumors" as conservapedia, so it was obvious you don't like the site. as do I. --KMFDM FAN ^(talk!) 20:15, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Radioactive afikomen. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Radioactive afikomen. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Radioactive afikomen. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)