Hello Radio Guy, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Happy editing! Cornell Rockey 03:17, 10 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

UEFA Golden Jubilee Poll edit

your attempt to create an AfD for UEFA Golden Jubilee Poll needs to be completed. please follow the ther steps of the process, thank you. ThuranX 08:36, 11 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Alt-A paper? edit

Please note that the link Alt-A paper which you added to the A paper article is a "redlink"; it is marked in red by the system because it doesn't lead to a real article.

If it was intended to point to a real article but doesn't work because of a typo, then it needs to be fixed.

If there is no article with a title like "Alt-A paper", then there is no point in having this link which should just be deleted. Dirac66 14:08, 11 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Your edit to Nicky Shorey edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Nicky Shorey, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Thank you. robwingfield «TC» 07:44, 1 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edits edit

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 03:21, 24 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

LOL edit

With this edit you've just pissed off about 500 whiny Ranger's fans. Just send Potvin to take care of them. OrangeMarlin Talk• Contributions 08:43, 27 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Betancourt edit

I don't think one article justifies a current tag. I hope she is released, see my comment here. Thanks, SqueakBox 00:28, 29 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Please don't apologize edit

You are generally right to do what you do about future tense. However, with this particular subject it is just my preference. Technically you are right and I am wrong. I do apologize about my cryptic edit summary. :) Turtlescrubber (talk) 00:48, 29 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Kieron Richardson / Keira Knightley edit

Hi. Just seen you "for" link on the Kieron Richardson page. Are people really going to mistake him for Keira Knightley? Seems a bit far-fetched to me personally. ~~ [Jam][talk] 23:51, 30 December 2007 (UTC)Reply


Your edit summary usage edit

 

Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:


 

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field - please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. Ohmpandya (Talk) 23:10, 9 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Edit summary edit

  Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, which wasn't included with your recent edit to Colin Kazim-Richards. Thank you. ♦Tangerines♦·Talk 18:53, 21 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

WP:Hornbook -- a new WP:Law task force for the J.D. curriculum edit

Hi Radio Guy,

I'm asking Wikipedians who are interested in United States legal articles to take a look at WP:Hornbook, the new "JD curriculum task force".

Our mission is to assimilate into Wikipedia all the insights of an American law school education, by reducing hornbooks to footnotes.

  • Over the course of a semester, each subpage will shift its focus to track the unfolding curriculum(s) for classes using that casebook around the country.
  • It will also feature an extensive, hyperlinked "index" or "outline" to that casebook, pointing to pages, headers, or {{anchors}} in Wikipedia (example).
  • Individual law schools can freely adapt our casebook outlines to the idiosyncratic curriculum devised by each individual professor.
  • I'm encouraging law students around the country to create local chapters of the club I'm starting at my own law school, "Student WP:Hornbook Editors". Using WP:Hornbook as our headquarters, we're hoping to create a study group so inclusive that nobody will dare not join.

What you can do now:

1. Add WP:Hornbook to your watchlist, {{User Hornbook}} to your userpage, and ~~~~ to Wikipedia:Hornbook/participants.
2. If you're a law student,
(You don't have to start the club, or even be involved in it; just help direct me to someone who might.)
3. Introduce yourself to me. Law editors on Wikipedia are a scarce commodity. Do knock on my talk page if there's an article you'd like help on.

Regards, Andrew Gradman talk/WP:Hornbook 19:55, 31 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply