Rachitrali

Home	Talk	My Articles	Awards	Projects	Drafts	Pictures	E-Mail

Welcome!

Hello, Rachitrali, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Jose77 (talk) 22:48, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Archive
1 2 3

Unblock me

@Matiia: @Izno: @Dereckson: Sir you mentioned my name in comments in english wiki, but unfortunately i have been blocked by mistakenly alleging that somebody and User:Rachitrali are using the same IP, I am using one IP address in cafe, library, if someone is also using the same IP address, then this is not my fault and my IP can not be blocked on the basis of one IP address, I believe I will not used puppet of me Please dont block me I will use 1 user. please unblock me so that I can defend myself by replying in the comments you mentioned me. Regard--Raki 17:30, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

@Matiia: @Izno: @Dereckson: The sockmaster for this appears to be Akbaralighazi and you've listed Rachitrali as a suspected sockpuppet at this investigation. There have been other many editors that have edited the khowar articles since its creation in 2008-2017 so it may be better to argue for blocking the regular contributor wikipedia based on criteria other than sockpuppetry. Some of the editors edited khowar articles in khowar wikipedia incubator project quite extensively and while these were undone by confirmed socks, this doesn't make it a denial of a approved wiki project on that basis alone. There is a decent articles, assertion of notability of Khowar language and Khowar Wikipedia here so it would be better to engage more contributor for khowar wikipeidia and clean the khowar articles. I request you to unblock me so that i can defend myself --Raki 01:55, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Unblock me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rachitrali (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

@Berean Hunter: Being aggrieved and dissatisfied by the one sided decision of User:Barean Hunder who blocked my account for indefinite period on the basis of misunderstanding and presumption that another user akbaralighazi is also using the same IP address, please note that i am part of WMF and a test admin in incubator and localizing the system mesgs into pakistani languages. sir instead of blocking Akbaralighazi you blocked the User Rachitrali who is test admin and worked with Wikimedia since 2010 without claiming a single penny from WMF, I have translated more than 1000 system messages into khowar language for khowar wikipedia and created more than 7000 khowar articles for wikipedia, this is not fair, this is discrimination that you have indefinitely blocked the test admin on the basis of presumption and the basis of same IP, please block akbaralighazi if he seems to be sock but I am real contributor of wikipedia and a test admin in incubator project and selflessly and tireless working with WMF by translating system messages and localizing the interface messages into Pakistani languages. Please keep in mind sir that on the basis of same IP one genuine and active user and test admin cannot be blocked indefinitely, please unblock me so that i'll all the remaining localization for creation of wikipedia in khowar language. thanks-Raki 10:01, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

If you indeed are a part of the Wikimedia Foundation's staff, please ask one of your colleagues to confirm that with a WMF staff account. That would still not addresses the problems with your conduct: Even if we ignore the sockpuppetry issue, you were blatantly promoting your own work on Wikipedia. See WP:SPAM. Huon (talk) 17:23, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have adjusted your request to be unblocked so that other admins will be able to see it and evaluate. After seeing the report from the steward at my posting on the COI noticeboard, they indicate otherwise. Checkusers at meta determined that you were socking.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 16:39, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

By the way, you have some explaining to do. You created an article about yourself in 2010 and it was deleted. When it went to AfD after the first sock case in 2015, you posted this: "...This article is written by some wikipedian. I have no relation to the Writer of this article...." but that is patently false. The one who wrote that was Mirajbibi. Here is a photo of you taken in 2003 and the uploader is that same editor. He uploaded it in 2012, a few months after you claimed to not know them. Please explain. Also, the use of the word "Imminent" as a title on that photo is the sort of peacock language that clearly illustrates a COI.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 18:16, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

...and you gave yourself credit for that same photo here. How does that work?
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 21:26, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

@Berean Hunter: sir, the photo Here is a photo has been uploaded by some Wikipedia, if there is some wrong statement please edit the same according to wiki policy, rules and guidelines--Raki 01:19, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Not uploaded by "some Wikipedia"(n)...you know this person and pretty much their edits have been to promote you. You need to explain this with some truth involved.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 04:11, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

@Berean Hunter: I am really disappointed, instead of appreciating of my contributions you linked me with sock Akbar, this is not fair. Being a linguist, author, researcher, engineer, scientist and Inventor and sufi poet Allama Iqbal's translator I am notable in Pakistan and more than 100 and above writer wrote articles about me and more than 20 tv channels and 40 newspaper has already produced documentry reports about my life and works and my services for the endangerd languages of Pakistan. The one of the leading Pashto TV channel Mashriq TV has recently produced a documentary about me [1], 92NewsHD tv [2], ARY News TV [3] this is not the issue, the issue is you linked my user page with the sock akbaralighazi who has already been blocked, this is not fair, I am a responsible and notable personality and working with you WMF as a volunteer editor and not claiming for my articles, translations and localization services from WMF but you mentioned my name with sock akbaralighazi already blocked user. If you think that akbaralighazi is sock and vandalizing in wikipedia then block him permanently and unblock me as I am also working with you as a responsible person, I assure you sir I'll contribute with Wiki free of cost in future- Regards --Raki 11:57, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

We are mostly volunteers that do not receive a penny either so you can stop referencing that. No one has disparaged any positive contributions that you may have made and I'm not questioning your notability. We have several outstanding questions that you have yet to answer. As yet, no member of the WMF has vouched for you or your proprietary claim of a WMF affiliation in your unblock request as requested by Huon. You have not given an adequate accounting of the fact that you actually know the other participants in those AfDs and you all appear to have been working in tandem with a disregard for core policies such as WP:SOCK & WP:COI. I would expect any experienced editor to know and abide by those let alone someone who is supposed to be an admin on a Wikimedia-affiliated project.

What is this? Someone using a static IP address that is entirely associated with you (publicly as seen here) and whose usage has been almost exclusively you, left that barnstar and signed it as our established Wiki editor Nina. I have a feeling that she didn't do that and that the whole thing is a forgery. I don't see this in her contribs to match that date and moreover the signature has been faked...our software doesn't automatically date with the month "Ocotber". Someone had to spell that out. If Nina really gave you that then I will apologize to you for that. Next we see this interesting edit which comes from that same IP but now has Mar4d's sig appended to the barnstar. Strangely, I don't see in Mar4d's contribs or the history of this talk page where he may have really done that so I have doubts that this is legit.. Some explanations are in order. If that was him then he will need to explain !voting here and using that same IP which would indicate culpability on his part but again, I'll wait for plausible explanations.

Here you participated with your IP in your 2nd AfD about your own article but tried to pretend this wasn't the case when confronted instead of just owning up to it. Here you try to promote yourself to Picture of the day and notably give credit to that photo to Miraj...so you indeed knew him for years. You won't be able to dodge these questions. Anyone that would seriously give consideration to unblocking you will have these answers. The longer you delay being honest with us, the more evidence I'll drag before you to show that we aren't blind to your activities and who people are. You seem to think that I have confused you for the named sockmaster when you don't understand that the case is being looked at as a nest of meatpuppets. Address your behavior, please.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 18:39, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Since I was pinged, I can confirm that the barnstar mentioned was given by me here (not anywhere else though). No comment on the rest, as I am unfamiliar with the background of this case. Mar4d (talk) 18:49, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

@Mar4d: sir please check this[4] your goodself has granted this Barnstar to me and now you are denying this, what is this? please recheck and give your comments here Thanks --Raki 02:34, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

No, he isn't denying it. He states above that he gave you the barnstar.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 02:58, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

@Berean Hunter: Please ignore the sock puppetry issue as I am using my personal user name Rachcitrali and the other the sock seems to be Akbaralighazi and he has already been indefinitely blocked, Please accept my appologize and sorry for this, I am not promoting my own work on Wikipedia, please remove the objectionable or promotional text you find, i have no objection for that as I am the responsible person and working like you in wikipedia, translatewiki, and incubator wiki projects, being a linguist and researcher i am localizing the pakistani languages wiki projects, please lift ban on my IP and on my personal User page Rachitrali and block the other accounts who are involved in sock puppetry, i assure you in future no such situation will be created In Sha Allah, Due to ban on my IP and my user page I am unable to defend myself in this wiki and being a test admin of khowar wiki i am unable to complete the localization and other taks in time, please accept my fullest cooperation in future and one again extreemly sorry for inconvenience and thank you very much for your time, guidence, help, Gold Bless you.--Raki 01:47, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rachitrali (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Due to some misunderstanding or by using of same IP of many users I have been blocked, and my IP and the IP of many users has also been blocked, due to this blockage of my ID and IP i am unable to defend myself, I request the Adminstrators to give me chance to defend myself by lifting ban on my ID and IP so that i can give my views regarding this issue, I have no concern with the alleged sock, the sock has already been banned permanantly. I am using my personal ID with my personal name. I think the administrators will not give one sided decision with listening me. Cheers--Raki 07:23, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

No need to unblock you for you to address the sockpuppetry and conflict-of-interest concerns. You are free to do so here. Indeed, this page is the appropriate venue for you to address these concerns. So, you are still able to defend yourself. Yamla (talk) 13:05, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rachitrali (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

The Sock seems to be Akbarali but why I have been blocked? I am using my personal account i.e. Rachitrali please check my activity and Akbaralighazi in this wiki and unblock me and block akbarali as he or she seems to be sock, I am not a Sock but I am real user and contributing wiki since long Raki 11:55, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Many question swere asked by Berean Hunter above, and you have answered none of them. You have been blocked as a WP:Meatpuppet of Akbaralighazi. Please, start answering those questions. You have to explain your connection to Akbaralighazi and other accounts. If you don't want to explain it, your talk page access will be removed. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:28, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Wikipedia Doteli

@Berean Hunter: @MF-Warburg: @Matiia: Sir, as per this [5] and this [6] there is no most active users available, but the LangCom approved this project without checkusered, please check the activity of contributors, recent changes by check user, Admin or syosp. This can be done before creation of this Wiki, please also check this[7] The 3 users are Test Administrators only but there are no independent contributors are available, please check the user’s activity and IP address by check user- Thanks Raki 08:05, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Unblock me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rachitrali (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

The sock Akbar Ali has already been blocked years ago, I have no relation to this account, I am using my personal account https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Rachitrali please check this and unblock me, I am not involved in any vandalism nor vandalize any article, the sock seems to be Akbar but you linked my user page him or her. I assure you sir I'll fully cooperate with with Wiki regarding contributions and no self promotional article will be uploaded in wiki in future, please block the socks and unblock me as I have created a Wikipedia in Khowar Language and i am contributing with translatewiki.net by translating more than 1000 system messages into khowar and doing localization in pakistani languages, if you permanently block me than i'll not be able to contribute with WMF regarding normalization of Khowar Wiki, localization of Pakistani language in incubator projects and definate I'll resign from my Test Admintratorship which please note. If you don'nt want to unblock me then I don'nt want to waste my precious time in Incubator Thanks --Raki 05:06, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

We're clearly seeing a blatant campaign of self-promotion here, via multiple accounts (and very likely multiple users) and an apparently common IP, and repeated denials of obvious connections with other accounts. As repeated requests for an explanation of the connections between these accounts have been ignored, talk page access has now been revoked. See WP:UTRS if you wish to appeal further. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:32, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• Comment: The unblock request above clearly shows that the now deleted utterly promotional (as in bordering on a hagiography) article Rehmat Aziz Chitrali is an autobiography, and also clearly links Rachitrali to a horde of other socks of Akbaralighazi who have created a considerable number of other articles promoting Rehmat Aziz Chitrali, some of whch are now at AfD (and all of which totally lack reliable third-party sources proving the notability of the subject). So all they've ever done here is promoting themself, not helping to build an encyclopaedia. - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 09:58, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Rachitrali: you wrote "definate I'll resign from my Test Admintratorship". seriously you better do it. Otherwise I am sure you will find Khowar Wikipedia you next venue for your self-promotion. User:Thomas.W: see [8] his auto-biography exists in many language edition of Wikipedia., is there a way to get them deleted as well? --119.160.119.154 (talk) 10:07, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Rachitrali (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #18229 was submitted on May 08, 2017 12:48:14. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 12:48, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

May 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but it appears you have written or added to an article about yourself, at Rehmat Aziz Chitrali Gold Medalist. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Saqib (talk) 13:08, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Portal:Khowar

Portal:Khowar, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Khowar and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Khowar during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Saqib (talk) 13:30, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Portal:Khowar

A tag has been placed on Portal:Khowar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

G5, Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Akbaralighazi; created by a sock puppet, and all substantial edits have also been made by socks

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 17:29, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Khowar-language poets for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Khowar-language poets is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Khowar-language poets until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Greenbörg (talk) 11:52, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Valleys of Chitral

Template:Valleys of Chitral has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 16:09, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Portal:Chitral, Pakistan

Portal:Chitral, Pakistan, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Chitral, Pakistan and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Chitral, Pakistan during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 17:13, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Portal:Kalash Valleys

Portal:Kalash Valleys, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Kalash Valleys and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Kalash Valleys during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 23:08, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Portal:Gilgit-Baltistan

Portal:Gilgit-Baltistan, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Gilgit-Baltistan and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Gilgit-Baltistan during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 20:31, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Portal:Urdu

Portal:Urdu, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Urdu and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Urdu during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:04, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Troq chai for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Troq chai is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Troq chai until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Lennart97 (talk) 14:17, 7 November 2021 (UTC)