Ra2007
D. James Kennedy part II edit
Please do not reinsert the "Wrong version" image onto the talk page of the D. James Kennedy article. The talk page is not the place to express your displeasure with administrative actions. There are numerous other venues to express your displeasure, such as the Admin Noticeboards or the talk page of the admin who locked the page. Cheers! Baegis (talk) 19:31, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- I think your characterization as inflammatory is unfair. It was levity, humor, intended to lighten up. Did you read the actual image? Clearly humorous. Ra2007 (talk) 19:32, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Any humor purported to be gained through displaying the image is not enough to cancel out the fact it is not helping the article and that it is meant as a veiled personal attack at the admin who justly locked the page. Baegis (talk) 08:12, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- Your psychic powers are as defective as your sense of humor. It was not "meant as a veiled personal attack". And, in fact, the locking admin pointed me to the image (and he seems to have a better sense of humor than yours). [1]. You should be more concerned about the notorious orangemarlin trying to stir up trouble.[2] Ra2007 (talk) 19:35, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Though I never claimed to have any psychic powers, thanks for the...well, thank you for whatever that statement meant. My sense of humor is not tickled by obvious POV pushers, except when they are finally given the boot. And the only time I would ever worry about OrangeMarlin would be if he suddenly begin to allow those of your ilk any leeway. Baegis (talk) 21:45, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Your psychic powers are as defective as your sense of humor. It was not "meant as a veiled personal attack". And, in fact, the locking admin pointed me to the image (and he seems to have a better sense of humor than yours). [1]. You should be more concerned about the notorious orangemarlin trying to stir up trouble.[2] Ra2007 (talk) 19:35, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Any humor purported to be gained through displaying the image is not enough to cancel out the fact it is not helping the article and that it is meant as a veiled personal attack at the admin who justly locked the page. Baegis (talk) 08:12, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Eagle eyes edit
No worries. When I saw that 100kb of text got added to your page, something didn't add up!! Woody (talk) 22:46, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Anti Christian Movement (China) edit
An article that you have been involved in editing, Anti Christian Movement (China), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anti Christian Movement (China). Thank you.