Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 20:13, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Once more, please do not post copyrighted material. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 20:17, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
This is your last warning; the next time you create an inappropriate page, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. I assure you the block will be of indefinite length. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 20:18, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
- Hi. Sorry to come off so harshly (that's the templates for you), but copyrights really are taken seriously around here. Whenever this situation comes up, I always advise against releasing your content to this site's licensing. It effectively puts it in the public domain and voids your original copyright. My advice would be to start over with something new in your own words. Just be careful not to breach any conflict-of-interest rules, found here. So, something original written in the neutral tone outlined at the link should be OK. I hope this answers your question. Again, sorry about the harsh messages, but you and I were going back and forth inserting and deleting the article. :) Good luck and please feel free to ask me or any user for assistance. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 20:27, 3 January 2011 (UTC)