User talk:RL0919/Archive 2005-2006
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Welcome
Welcome! (We can't say that loud/big enough!)
Here are a few links you might find helpful:
- Be Bold!
- Don't let grumpy users scare you off.
- Meet other new users
- Learn from others
- Play nice with others
- Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
- Tell us about you
If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page.
We're so glad you're here! -- Essjay · Talk 16:26, July 12, 2005 (UTC)
- Thanks, glad to be here. :-) -- RL0919
Wow
Thanks for cleaning up the bias on Objectivism. It was pretty awful. Dave (talk) 19:01, July 12, 2005 (UTC)
- You have wrote what I should have and did it better than I could have. You have also convinced me that AR doesn't belong in the "LGBT Rights Opponent" category under the stated criteria.Billyjoekoepsel 18:18, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
Alienus's edit war
Alienus insists on categorizing Ayn Rand in "LGBT Rights opposition," despite the strong consensus against it. Since I am close to violation of the revert rules, I would greatly appreciate help in reverting Alienus's non-consensus changes. Thank you. LaszloWalrus 07:42, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
Objectivism and Pseudoreligion
The pseudoreligion article seems to have a pretty heavy bias. You seem to be an expert on Objectivism. I was wondering what you thought? LaszloWalrus 07:57, 24 May 2006 (UTC)