User talk:Qyd/Archive 2

Latest comment: 17 years ago by Trailmix1234 in topic copyvio notice on John Glenn (Alberta)

GVRD Maps

Hey, I really enjoy your GVRD maps. I noticed that you did post the White Rock map, and you may have noticed I reverted it back. I think the maps are great, but are all the maps ready to put up? Can't we change all the GVRD maps at once? I just believe that uniformity is important. What do you think?! Adenosine | Talk 07:26, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

I changed all maps in Greater_Vancouver_Regional_District#Municipalities 2-3 weeks ago. White Rock might have been among the first replaced. Qyd(talk)13:43, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

World Heritage template

Thanks for your help in the Canadian template. I don't have any idea how to insert the flag and emblem in the main box. Really appreciate it. =) Joey80 06:05, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

Image:Greater Vancouver A, British Columbia Location.png

You missed Douglas Island in this map. It's the island just west of Barnston Island (which is highlighted). :) --→Buchanan-Hermit™..SCREAM!!!.... 05:56, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

All of the maps I own have Douglas Island as unincorporated. --→Buchanan-Hermit™..Talk to Big Brother 01:40, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

I did some research and apparently Douglas Island is not unincorporated, despite what all my maps tell me. That's kinda weird. Oh well. Sorry about the misinformation. -→Buchanan-Hermit/!? 07:23, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Image:Division No. 10, Alberta Location.png

Wow. I just saw your map when it was placed on a page I watch. (en:New Norway, Alberta). It looks great. Cheers.--Bookandcoffee 06:41, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Maps

I quite like the new Alberta location maps. Nice one. --Arch26 20:01, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Image:Blak spruce Muskeg.JPG

Many thanks! - MPF 21:01, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:StAlbet-logo.png

Thanks for uploading Image:StAlbet-logo.png. However, the copyright tag you've used is deprecated or obsolete, and should not be used. This could be because the tag is inaccurate or misleading, or because it does not adequately specify the copyright status of the image. For a list of copyright tags that are in current use, see the "Public domain", "Free license", and "Fair use" sections of Wikipedia:Image copyright tags.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:06, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

fixed

Image Tagging for Image:Kamloops-lCOA.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Kamloops-lCOA.png. However, the copyright tag you've used is deprecated or obsolete, and should not be used. This could be because the tag is inaccurate or misleading, or because it does not adequately specify the copyright status of the image. For a list of copyright tags that are in current use, see the "Public domain", "Free license", and "Fair use" sections of Wikipedia:Image copyright tags.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:09, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

fixed

Image Tagging for Image:Llodminster-COA.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Llodminster-COA.png. However, the copyright tag you've used is deprecated or obsolete, and should not be used. This could be because the tag is inaccurate or misleading, or because it does not adequately specify the copyright status of the image. For a list of copyright tags that are in current use, see the "Public domain", "Free license", and "Fair use" sections of Wikipedia:Image copyright tags.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:07, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

fixed

Wikimedia vote

Buna,

A inceput un vot pentru stergerea "Wikipediei Moldovenesti", o creatie a unui American, cu origini suspecte in Basarabia si care nu vorbeste limba wikipediei la care pretinde a fi sysop. Il cheama Node ue si pentru a crea impresia ca lumea doreste aceasta wikipedie, a apelat la toti utilizatorii rusi care au venit sa voteze de partea lui desi nu cunosc bine subiectul si li s-a spus ca voteaza pentru supravietuirea alfabetului chirilic. Asa a ajuns ca votul sa fie 31 pentru stergerea Mo wiki, si 42 impotriva stergerii - deci in alte cuvinte pentru pastrarea wikipediei in limba "moldoveneasca". Vino si voteaza aici[1] , ca sa sergem acesta creatura cu miros bolshevic, care insulta toti romanii de pe ambele maluri ale Prutului. Node ue le-a spus rusilor sa traduca mesajul lui in limba rusa si sa-l transmita mai departe. Trimite si tu mesajul acesta la toti utilizatorii romani-unionisti sau romani-moldoveni unionisti pe care-i cunosti pe en.wiki sau ro.wiki. Dapiks 23:50, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the barnstar. With the number of U.S. National Parks that are featured articles, it's only appropriate that Banff National Park (and others) be brought up to featured status. I'm slowly filling in details, will be adding material about the internment camps in Banff during WWI and WWII, more about the geology, more about human impact, etc. I also have GIS files to make a map of the park (like Shoshone National Forest, but more details and shaded relief). Let me know you have any suggestions, or feel free to add anything to the article. Thanks. -Kmf164 (talk contribs) 18:36, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

TFD

If the tag is not included, it is only visible to those who happen to look at the template itself or have the time to pay attention to TFD. On the other hand, when it is included, it is seen by all who use the articles it is in. This is why the tfd template is in small text. --SPUI (T - C) 04:33, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

copyvio notice on John Glenn (Alberta)

The John Glenn (Alberta) article is started new on the temp page, with all copyvio removed. Can you please remove the copyvio tag so the editor can start working fresh on the article? Thanks. - Qyd(talk)03:40, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

The only way I could remove the copyvio tag is to delete the history (which I strongly believe is a copyright violation). I shouldn't do this myself but allow one of the closing admins that monitors copyvios do this, which should happen in about a week. The reason is to get a second opinion before anything is deleted. As for editing the article in the mean time, the temp page is there for exactly that purpose. -- JamesTeterenko 13:53, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks Qyd, I have totally rewritten the article, it is in my own words and supplied my own pictures, so there shouldn't be a problem with the page now. You did put a note on there to wikify (wow you guys are fast) but I looked up what wikify constitutes and I don't see what I need to add? If you have time perhaps you could add that to the talk area of the article and I will see what I can do. Trailmix1234 01:33, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

Great Work

Excellent work on condensing the Winnipeg article. I have been so intent on filling the article with content as well as trying to fill the holes throughout that I haven't had a chance to really compile it all into something more readable. Hope you have a chance to do the same to the Manitoba article at some point. I will be trying to fill it with content soon as it is woefully in need of further details in relation to other provinces. I have no barnstars to give away but would you care for an Order of the Bison? jdobbin 00:27, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

The file you uploaded ([2]) seems to have disappeared or never existed... It's something that you might want to fix. Hope that's helpful --Mr Minchin 17:29, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

shows fine here Qyd 19:59, 30 June 2006 (UTC)