Quutamo123
My Talk Page edit
Am open and reasonable, Will try to be as neutral as possible with my edits. I'm going to try to make my job on this website making sure people have properly sourced material. If I removed something that you think was unfair I will have an open mind. Am pursuing law right now and using this to help my practice.
December 2020 edit
Your recent editing history at Order of Nine Angles shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Nthep (talk) 17:27, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Quutamo123, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit
|
Hi Quutamo123! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 4 December 2020 (UTC) |