User talk:Pyrotec/Archive11Q4
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The Bugle: Issue LXVII, September 2011
|
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 02:40, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
Westhill, Aberdeenshire review/help
You reviewed the above article some time ago at the request of myself. I have made the occasional edit here and there to the article, but I have ultimately come to the end of what I can actually think of doing short of a proper overhaul of the article. I popped into the Central Library to harvest information from the Statistical Accounts of Scotland; unfortunately to my dismay Westhill did not feature in the newest edition. Any help and advice would be greatly appreciated, Thanks (I also hope I put this request in the correct place, haha) Eeveeman (talk) 21:49, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXVIII, October 2011
|
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 08:39, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
Stanley Holloway FAC
Hi hope your well, I need to pick your brains. I have nominated the above having been tweeking it here and there since you awarded GA status back in September. I have had a few issues raised all of which I have addressed except for one.
I have been questioned about the reliability of four sources and need your rational for deeming these reliable sources during GAN.
They are this, this? this? and this?
If your able to give me this then that would be great as I feel it's just this point stopping it from becoming a possible FA -- All the best Cassianto (talk) 00:32, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
- Hi. I think the referencing issues are getting under control, but the article has not received many reviews so far at FAC. If you have any time to review the article (several changes have been made since you saw it previously) and [Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Stanley Holloway/archive1 comment here], it would be much appreciated. All the best! -- Ssilvers (talk) 21:02, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
Peer review of Tiruchirappalli
Hi! Since you were the person who had done GA-review of Tiruchirappalli, I wish to bring it to you notice that I had submitted the article for a peer-review as a step towards taking it to FA-class. I invite you to give your comments.-RaviMy Tea Kadai 15:55, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXIX, November 2011
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 21:02, 27 December 2011 (UTC)