Hi, Punkramz, Welcome to Wikipedia!

I hope you like this place — I sure do — and want to stay. Before getting too in-depth, you may want to read about the Five pillars of Wikipedia and simplified ruleset. If you need help on how to title new articles check out the naming conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the manual of style. If you need help look at Wikipedia:Help and the FAQ , plus if you can't find your answer there, check the Village Pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions)! There's still more help at the Tutorial and Policy Library. Plus, don't forget to visit the Community Portal. And if you have any more questions after that, feel free to post them on my user talk page or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will be by to help you shortly.


Additional tips edit

Here's some extra tips to help you get around in the 'pedia!

  • If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.
  • You can sign your name using three tildes (~). If you use four, you can add a datestamp too. Five will get you the datestamp only.
  • You may want to add yourself to the new user log.
  • If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.
  • If you're still entirely confused, or would like to get a better grasp of your wikipedia skills, and you have an IRC client (or don't mind getting one), check out the Bootcamp. It's not what it sounds like, but it is fun and can help you with your editing skills.
  • If you're bored and want to find something to do, try the Random page button in the sidebar, or check out the Open Task message in the Community Portal.

Happy Wiki-ing.Kf4bdy talk contribs

Little context in Ramil Trinidad edit

 

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Ramil Trinidad, by Marwood (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Ramil Trinidad is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Ramil Trinidad, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 10:24, 16 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Ramz Trinidad edit

 

A tag has been placed on Ramz Trinidad requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. NickContact/Contribs 03:43, 14 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image copyright problem with Image:Ramz.JPG edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Ramz.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 03:45, 14 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Ramz.JPG listed for deletion edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Ramz.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. NickContact/Contribs 14:11, 14 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image copyright problem with File:Sjdm city hall.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading File:Sjdm city hall.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 06:35, 27 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Gaya-Gaya edit

Gaya-Gaya!!! Secaundis (talk) 08:16, 27 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Author? Editor? Administrator? edit

Haha. Author? Editor? Administrator of San Jose del Monte City? Haha!! Secaundis (talk) 08:15, 28 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image copyright problem with File:Sjdm city hall.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading File:Sjdm city hall.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:45, 2 January 2009 (UTC)Reply


Speedy deletion of Ramz Trinidad edit

 

A tag has been placed on Ramz Trinidad requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. FlyingToaster 09:55, 5 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Ramz Trinidad edit

 

I have nominated Ramz Trinidad, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramz Trinidad. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. — KvЯt GviЯnЭlБ Speak! 05:02, 7 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

January 2009 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Santa Maria, Bulacan has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. –Capricorn42 (talk) 13:16, 17 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

  The recent edit you made to User:Angeles624 constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. –Capricorn42 (talk) 13:20, 17 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

SJDM edit

Tanong mo kay roquero kung bkit naging city yan. 1st city? Yes FIRST nga pero maunlad ba? Sa tingin mo? Dba hindi naman? Tgnan mo ung talk ng SJDM, c Angeles624 at Titopao e cnasbing not progressive tlga yang city nyo. Napakalaki ng kaibahan ng SJDM sa Sta. Maria. Pagkumparahin mo nga ang Poblacion Sta. Maria sa Sampol SJDM? Makikita mo. Secaundis (talk) 05:29, 18 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

sjdm edit

Hey! Please sa talkpage ko ikw magsulat ng sa2bihin mo! Yes i know na me tungko pa at muzon pero d pako nka2punta dun, kya d ko pa ito mapagku2mpara. At d lang naman ang poblacion d2 ang busines districts d2, we have brgy. Bagbaguin, pulong buhangin, guyong and here in sta.clara. Pero d pa ito ganun kaunlad. At my advantage tlga ang sjdm para umunlad ng mblis dhl sa laki ng population, (439,090) at mlapit kau sa Q.C. Nkapunta knba d2 sa poblacion sta.maria? Secaundis (talk) 11:23, 18 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

The fake city of bulacan edit

Oh I see, 350+ edits na ako sa sta.maria wiki. Pero ang sta.maria ang me pnakamataas na ytang pop. Growth rate sa buong bulacan. 5.16% compare to sjdm's 4% something. At d2 dn ako pnanganak sa sta.maria at d2 dn ako nkatra ngaun. Sory pero d ko alm ung mga most business frendly town/city eh. By the way nkapunta knb dun sa baliuag? Pnakamaunlad na ytang bayan d2 sa bul. ang baliuag. Secaundis (talk) 14:32, 18 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

<?> edit

"In the Philippines, the term may also simply refer to a RURAL village and is spelled in Filipino as baryo". -yan, rural village daw, e rural ba ang catmon at bulac? E lhat ng brgy d2 sa sta.maria e urban na! At sa tingin ko ang brgy. Poblacion, Bagbaguin and Sta. Clara ay Mga highly urbanized barangay! Me mga pics kba jan ng tungko and muzon? Secaundis (talk) 03:30, 25 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of SM City Tungko edit

I have nominated SM City Tungko, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SM City Tungko. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Lenticel (talk) 05:52, 9 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Fatima II, San Jose del Monte for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fatima II, San Jose del Monte is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fatima II, San Jose del Monte until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:10, 12 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Fatima III, San Jose del Monte for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fatima III, San Jose del Monte is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fatima III, San Jose del Monte until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:13, 12 July 2021 (UTC)Reply