User talk:Pulisi/Archive 2
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
Generic trademarks
Hello Pulisi, it seems that your article List of English words or terms that have been trademarked or copyrighted duplicates the topic of an already existing article, List of generic and genericized trademarks. I wasn't able to see a reason to keep them seperate, so the new page has been tagged for deletion (WP:A10). – Thjarkur (talk) 10:42, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
- If you disagree with this tag or you meant to do something different with this article, just let me know (or ping me on the article's talk page). However from the title it seems like the topic might be words like "Apple" that later became trademarked. – Thjarkur (talk) 11:02, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Thjarkur, I now see where I went wrong, the original intention was to have a seperate page for British English terms, but that wasn't made clear. I'm still a fairly new editor so I feel your decision is probably right as the feesability of listing just British English terms is low. Thanks, --Pulisi (talk) 13:10, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Rhys Lewis (musician)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Rhys Lewis (musician) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:08, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Rhys Lewis (musician) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rhys Lewis (musician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhys Lewis (musician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ☆★Mamushir (✉✉) 14:07, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
78.30.183.44 - November 2020
Stop reverting warnings about terrible writing. If you can not see an article is illiterate, OTHERS CAN. So buzz off! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.30.183.44 (talk) 20:31, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
- @78.30.183.44 I have removed the warning however I would suggest you tag the area of the article that is in need of corrections so others can find errors quicker. Thanks, --Pulisi (talk) 20:35, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
#VirtualToursLive
Fields Medal (Female recipients and Notes)
"I noticed that you recently removed content from Fields Medal without adequately explaining why".
It is dequately explained in last edits. "Statistical analysis of female recipients of most prestigious awards in STEM fields is not specific to Fields Medal, and repetition of facts is unnecessary." ""In 2014, Maryam Mirzakhani became the first woman as well as the first Iranian to win the Fields Medal" (in Landmarks) is fact; section "Female recipients" is unnecessary political activism. Section "Notes" was empty." Note: Repetition of facts is kind of activism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.222.217.95 (talk) 22:40, 28 November 2020 (UTC)