August 2023 edit

  Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to Pomnyun because they seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 07:39, 30 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello,
I had way too many links removed from my page. Please put them back as I am planning to describe the Four Initiatives Pomnyun Sunim is trying to establish with Jungto Society. He is particularly well known for his Youtube talks so that should definitely not be removed from the site. Psychroanoker (talk) 08:32, 30 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
I can't leave a message on your talk page because it is completely blocked, but I am happy to leave a message on your talk page next go around. Also, in regards to the block, I couldn't get your message in time so sorry about that. Psychroanoker (talk) 00:10, 2 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Pomnyun. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. 2406:3003:2077:1E60:A3EF:7617:2021:2DE7 (talk) 08:25, 30 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Sorry Sorry. I wanted to take some short cuts instead of me having to explain JTS, Good Friends, EcoBuddha, and The Peace Foundation. I went ahead and just summarized them in another section instead. It is a core part of what Pomnyun does on a regular basis. Psychroanoker (talk) 02:09, 1 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
“If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it.” - Can you teach me how to do this? Psychroanoker (talk) 14:29, 1 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
I read up on it. Yes, that sounds appropriate and I can do that! Psychroanoker (talk) 00:08, 2 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Notification: Blocked edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding {{unblock|your reason here}} below this notice. Materialscientist (talk) 01:57, 1 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

September 2023 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Pomnyun, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 01:57, 1 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, I was trying to add that moment with Venerable Pomnyun and his teacher. I avoid adding that script then. I admit that it did not look that good. Please put me back on and keep my links in regards to the Yeongseong as well. Psychroanoker (talk) 02:05, 1 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hello, I need some help with understanding the vandalism piece. The dialog I had put on there is a true story, but the only source I could find was “”jungto.org.” I know the Wikipedia website looked like a gray block mess, but I was unsure of any other way to present this. Could I have an explanation on why it is considered vandalism so that I may avoid the same mistake? Psychroanoker (talk) 14:25, 1 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Psychroanoker (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I will not add that dialog. I was just trying to show that moment between Venerable Pomnyun and his teacher. It's on the Jungto.org website under Introduction to Pomnyun so I am unsure how that counts for vandalism? Also, I am in kind of a hurry because Venerable Ponyun is giving talks in Europe and the United States this month. Sorry for being so rash with the changes, but this is generally the first source that English speakers go to for information and this page was kind of sparse and left out a lot of stuff. You can compare it with the Korean Wikipedia for Pomnyun, which has a lot of his awards and achievements there. In regards to the Yongseong link, I will try to find a better credible source. I was doing the editing from my computer at work and couldn't access all the websites I needed to due to a firewall on the Korean Buddhist website. Also, the Yongseong and Paik Yonsung are the same people.

Decline reason:

Copying content from another website is blatantly inappropriate. As you don't see anything wrong with your contributions, we have to leave the block in place. Yamla (talk) 11:00, 1 September 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Psychroanoker (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

@Materialscientist: First off, my sincere apologies for giving you a hard time and making you feel ignored. I didn't realize you were trying to help me out and my usage of my User talk page was slow and ignorant. Hopefully, with a slow, cautious, and more methodical approach to providing information in addition to more frequent checking of the User Talk Page, I will react more promptly to the feedback you and the other editors provide for me.Psychroanoker (talk) 03:30, 6 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Yamla: Sorry, Sorry, I am new at this. This is actually the first time I am editing on Wikipedia and I admit that I am not great at this. I will slow down and use the talk function more often prior to making edits. [1]. I will avoid copying from other websites and will consult on how to cite sources if needed. [2] I am sorry for the ignorant plagiarism. I really tried my best to cite the source and dialog, but it was a bit over my head in terms of skill as a rookie on this site figuring out how to cite direct quotations into Wikipedia, such as this:[3].
Copying content from another website is blatantly inappropriate. As you don't see anything wrong with your contributions, we have to leave the block in place.
— Yamla , Unblock Decline Reason, 1 September 2023
I am willing to learn or step aside and ask for assistance. I will try my best on asking before making changes directly on site or suggest that someone put up something through the "Talk" function on the page.[4]Psychroanoker (talk) 03:30, 6 September 2023 (UTC) I will do my best to summarize the facts in a neutral manner and cite my sources directly (such as the Niwano peace prize site as opposed to namu.wiki or Wikipedia).[3] I will try to adhere to the policies of making the site look uniform as possible to other Wikipedia page biographies based on the 5 pillars.[5] I, by no means, wish to be a "disruptive editor" or "Vandal" and truthfully just want to focus on Venerable Pomnyun's biography, peacekeeping, and humanitarian work. [6] I have also read the "Your First Article" in regards to biographies and will attempt to use the talk function more often to suggest articles as a means of providing information for discussion as suggested in the "Your First Article" page.[7] I will be mindful of what constitutes as an appropriate external link and try to consult on the chat page to see if they are relevant prior to putting them in. I read over the policy.[8]. Also, thank you to the one that included Jungtosociety.org into the page. I am so grateful that at least Venerable Pomnyun's most updated website is on the wikipedia page. Also, thank you two (three??? If including 2406:3003:2077:1E60:A3EF:7617:2021:2DE7 for guiding me on this. I really hope we can make a great Pomnyun Wikipedia page together and I have already appreciated the edits that you all made to make it look nice.Reply

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action, or you have not responded to questions raised during that time. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:36, 30 November 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Yamla: I am really giving it my best shot here. I have not designed web pages before, but hopefully this shows that I am trying to figure these things out. Honestly, it was kind of fun learning about these things with the excellent guides that Wikipedia provides. Maybe there was a reason for the tough love after all.Psychroanoker (talk) 19:54, 6 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Materialscientist: Am I on the unblock Request list? It's just been a while and I am hoping for an update on the statusPsychroanoker (talk) 22:47, 20 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Materialscientist has pings turned off so they won't see this unless they are following this page. 331dot (talk) 15:10, 27 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
That is good to know and thank you for the notice. :) Psychroanoker (talk) 20:10, 27 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
@331dot Any clarification as to why my name is not showing up on the "Summary of pending on-wiki appeals?" Psychroanoker (talk) 00:27, 17 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
I don't know why it is specifically not in the summary, but it is in the category. 331dot (talk) 08:22, 17 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
@331dot That's a relief and thank you. Psychroanoker (talk) 15:32, 17 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Psychroanoker (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

1) The block is no longer necessary because you understand what you have been blocked for: :I am sorry for the extra cleanup work I caused to the Wikipedia editors/administrators due to frequent disruptive editing without regards to Wikipedia rules. I am also sorry I did not respond to the Wikipedia administrator via the "talk" function when a warning was sent. 2) Will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and will make useful contributions instead: :I have learned that there is a "talk" function on each Wikipedia page that can be used to present information or discuss the page with other editors and administrators. I am sorry I did not use this function to check if something was appropriate to post on a Wikipedia page. I hope to be able to contribute to Wikipedia pages by presenting information through the "Talk" Function. I have already made efforts to warn others interested in editing to not make changes on a Wikipedia page without reviewing Wikipedia resources and guidelines. In regard to Wikipedia page editing, I plan to review guidelines and discuss with other editors via "Talk" function prior to making changes on a Wikipedia page. I hope my humble unblock request is considered. Psychroanoker (talk) 9:00 pm, 30 November 2023, Thursday (1 month, 26 days ago) (UTC−5)

Accept reason:

per discussion and OK on blocking admins talk. Welcome back.-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:55, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Many Thanks _()_ Still proceeding with caution as promised. (Ok sign) Psychroanoker (talk) 23:21, 15 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

References edit

unblock discussion edit

Please describe concisely and clearly how your edits merited a block, what you would do differently, and what constructive edits you would make. Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:17, 22 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for the inquiry.

1) Truthfully, the first thing was that I didn't do was read the guidelines. I will reference the guidelines on how to make changes to wikipedia pages Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia.
2) I didn't do a great job referencing material. I will use the talk function to discuss sources that could be referenced. Also, I will make sure the referenced sources are academic or direct sources based on the guidelines on Wikipedia:Citing sources. No more copying and pasting without direct reference. No more referencing from other information sources like https://namu.wiki/ based on the guidelines specified on WP:USERGENERATED.
3) When an editor messages me, I am now aware how I can respond to an editor in a timely manner and will be mindful of the alert badge Help:Notifications. Prior to the block, I was making a lot of changes without paying attention to the alert badge. I think doing any changes slowly and with consultation should help with this.
4) I didn't know how to do a quote box. I also didn't consult with anyone on whether it would have been a good quote to add as well. I know how to use the quote box now based on this template Template:Quote box.
5) I was told to not make Wikipedia a collection of links so I will avoid adding lots of links on the webpage. As it was explained to me, Wikipedia is not an advertisement site, and it was meant to be used as a neutral encyclopedia site. Psychroanoker (talk) 05:22, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
@331dot: What do you think? I'll have to drop MS a note. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:27, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
I think it's worth a shot. 331dot (talk) 22:19, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
My humble thanks to the both of you and I will not let you down. I plan to practice caution because this experience has helped me understand how much of a privilege it is to be able to have a voice on this website and how important it is to follow the rules. 🙏 Psychroanoker (talk) 10:50, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply