Please exercise a little more restraint in placing your new Category:Extremism on articles-- a number that you have used it on are clearly not inherently extremist: Agnosticism, Criticism of religion, Religion, Ethics, Political criticism, among others, are simply not reasonable category members. The category itself is of doubtful value, as assigning is is largely a matter of point of view, which is something we strive to avoid at Wikipedia. -- Mwanner | Talk 18:35, 8 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

On thinking this over more, I have decided to nominate the category for deletion. You may argue against its deletion here if you wish.

Sorry for this negative start to your career here at Wikipedia-- don't feel bad, this sort of thing happens a lot. Wikipedia is a huge place with an immense amount of policy, none of which is real obvious when you start out. I'm going to include a standard welcome message, to help you get started.

Welcome!

Hello, Poulton~enwiki, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  -- Mwanner | Talk 18:59, 8 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thank you edit

Thank you for trying to keep the Graham Staines article, fair and unbiased.--Kathanar 16:26, 12 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

If you're interested, theres a move to delete a category [[1]] on religious supremacists by some with that agenda, please take alook if you would like to put your two cent in --Kathanar 23:05, 12 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

No worries, thanks for replying though, I was just away myself last couple of weeks, hope your holidays were good, I'll talk to you soon. Have a great day!--Kathanar 14:29, 23 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Your account will be renamed edit

02:27, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed edit

17:44, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

New Challenge for Oceania and Australia edit

Hi, Wikipedia:WikiProject Oceania/The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/The 5000 Challenge are up and running based on Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge which has currently produced over 2300 article improvements and creations. The Australia challenge would feed into the wider region one and potentially New Zealand could have a smaller challenge too. The main goal is content improvement, tackling stale old stubs and important content and improving sourcing/making more consistent but new articles are also welcome if sourced. I understand that this is a big goal for regular editors, especially being summertime where you are, but if you'd like to see large scale quality improvements happening for Oceania and Australia like The Africa Destubathon, which has produced over 1700 articles in 5 weeks, sign up on the page. The idea will be an ongoing national editathon/challenge for the region but fuelled by a series of contests to really get articles on every province and subject mass improved. The Africa contest scaled worldwide would naturally provide great benefits to Oceania countries, particularly Australia and attract new editors. I would like some support from existing editors here to get the Challenges off to a start with some articles to make doing a Destubathon worthwhile and potentially bring about hundreds of improvements in a few weeks through a contest! Cheers.♦ --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:12, 24 November 2016 (UTC)Reply