Jonathan Best edit

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Jonathan Best. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:11, 26 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Karen Disher edit

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Karen Disher. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:11, 26 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Jonathan Best edit

 

The article Jonathan Best has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs 00:33, 26 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Karen Disher edit

 

The article Karen Disher has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs 00:33, 26 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of John Cothran, Jr. edit

 

The article John Cothran, Jr. has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. SummerPhD (talk) 01:32, 26 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

May 2010 edit

  Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Danny Jacobs (actor) worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 01:36, 26 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Jonathan Best. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 01:38, 26 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Karen Disher. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 01:39, 26 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Danny Jacobs (actor), without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 02:19, 26 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppetry case edit

 

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Onelifefreak2007 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Steamroller Assault (talk) 02:24, 26 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Teala Dunn edit

 

The article Teala Dunn has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. SummerPhD (talk) 02:43, 26 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

  This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles, as you did to Jonathan Best, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. SummerPhD (talk) 02:44, 26 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Beth Chalmers edit

 

The article Beth Chalmers has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. SummerPhD (talk) 16:39, 26 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

  This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to Are We There Yet? (TV series), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - SummerPhD (talk) 17:39, 26 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Coy Stewart. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. - SummerPhD (talk) 18:00, 26 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Copyright violation edit

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the Are We There Yet? (TV series) article, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, and under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribute Share-Alike."

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question at the "Help Desk". You can also leave a message on my talk page. - SummerPhD (talk) 19:30, 26 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

  This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Javier Fernández-Peña, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. GregJackP (talk) 19:36, 26 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Jocelyn Stuart edit

 

A tag has been placed on Jocelyn Stuart requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ScottyBerg (talk) 22:54, 26 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sock puppet edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet. (blocked by –MuZemike 22:55, 26 May 2010 (UTC))Reply
You may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.

AfD nomination of Beth Chalmers edit

An article that you have been involved in editing, Beth Chalmers, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beth Chalmers. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. SummerPhD (talk) 18:03, 2 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Jonathan Best edit

An article that you have been involved in editing, Jonathan Best, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Best. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. SummerPhD (talk) 16:29, 3 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of John Cothran, Jr. edit

 

The article John Cothran, Jr. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No reliable sources, no indication of notability. Tagged for almost half a decade without improvement.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Huon (talk) 22:46, 21 April 2015 (UTC)Reply