February 2015 edit

  Hello, I'm MelbourneStar. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Emily Osment without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! —MelbourneStartalk 12:05, 8 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Emily Osment, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Jonathanarpith (talk) 13:10, 14 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Emily Osment. –Davey2010Talk 18:02, 14 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Blocked edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Ricky81682 (talk) 09:09, 16 February 2015 (UTC)Reply