Hi Piotras18, then please make a new table counter for senior snooker tournament wins, I do not see how a player after retiring can still add titles to their professional non-ranking wins, while those tournaments are participated by amateurs. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.166.127.90 (talk) 14:04, 14 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Piotras18, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit

 

Hi Piotras18! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Lilley (snooker player) (August 28) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Kpgjhpjm were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Kpgjhpjm 10:06, 28 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: George Pragnall (August 28) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gbawden was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Gbawden (talk) 13:39, 28 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alex Taubman (August 29) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SportingFlyer were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SportingFlyer talk 02:07, 29 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brian Cini (August 29) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CASSIOPEIA was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CASSIOPEIA(talk) 11:11, 29 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for September 6 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Itaro Santos, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page German (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 6 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Andreas Ploner edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Andreas Ploner requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.  Velella  Velella Talk   20:02, 15 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of John Whitty (snooker player) edit

 

The article John Whitty (snooker player) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. JC7V-constructive zone 18:53, 17 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Brian Cini edit

 

The article Brian Cini has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Amateur sportsperson that has competed in a handful of tournaments, no coverage in independent reliable sources, does not meet WP:GNG or any subject-specific guideline for notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. signed, Rosguill talk 22:04, 5 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Andreas Ploner for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andreas Ploner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andreas Ploner until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. signed, Rosguill talk 22:10, 5 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

October 2018 edit

  Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Andreas Ploner. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you.  Velella  Velella Talk   22:57, 5 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of John Whitty (snooker player) edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on John Whitty (snooker player) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.  Velella  Velella Talk   22:59, 5 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8)) edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Andreas Ploner. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:15, 6 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

October 2018 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at John Whitty (snooker player), you may be blocked from editing.  Velella  Velella Talk   08:24, 6 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of John Whitty (snooker player) edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on John Whitty (snooker player) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.  Velella  Velella Talk   08:25, 6 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

October 2018 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. JC7V-constructive zone 17:10, 6 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Andreas Ploner, you may be blocked from editing.  Velella  Velella Talk   17:41, 6 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Jamie Clarke edit

Hi how are you ?. Can you remove the Rhys from Jamie's name on his homepage ?. Why did Armbrust redirect without discussing this with others ?. I can't change it can you please ?. Regards 92.251.198.88 (talk) 20:32, 12 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Did you get my message ?. 77.75.241.9 (talk) 19:49, 13 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, Piotras18. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

December 2018 edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Alan McManus, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 22:01, 6 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Alex Taubman edit

 

Hello, Piotras18. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Alex Taubman".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. DannyS712 (talk) 09:00, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Wayne Brown (snooker player) edit

 

Hello, Piotras18. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Wayne Brown".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. DannyS712 (talk) 08:28, 17 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

March 2019 edit

  Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing →   Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Drmies (talk) 19:33, 30 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Jamie Clarke Snooker player edit

Hi can you remove the name Rhys from his wiki homepage as he does not go by this name ?. someone changed this back why I ask. can you help please ?. regards DooksFoley147 (talk) 00:36, 31 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi you never replied to me ?. Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by DooksFoley147 (talkcontribs) 17:10, 1 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Snooker edit

Can you Stop Adding a 114 Break From Neil Robertson, Cause it Didn’t Happen. Check the Centuries Page On World Snooker Website. I Also Saw it On Twitter, he Made a 96. Zander014 (talk) 19:32, 20 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Adding century breaks during matches edit

Hi can you please add some comment when you are adding century breaks during matches. you leave no comments I nearly added Cahill's ton against Maguire a second time. Could you not say "made in frame 4 against maguire or levelled at 2-2 with century. so people know what is being added. it is very frustrating. 92.251.158.138 (talk) 10:31, 26 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

you are doing it on Maguire's page also without adding info. please add what frame the century break is made in, this is going to lead to mistakes otherwise. 92.251.158.138 (talk) 10:52, 26 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

I asked you to add a comment when you are adding century breaks. do you not bother reading any of this ? 92.251.202.226 (talk) 21:19, 26 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

did i ask you a question regarding century breaks ?. edit

Do you not have the manners to reply ? 80.233.80.124 (talk) 11:39, 28 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Articles moved to drafts edit

An few articles you recently created, which are listed below, do not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. They need more citations from reliable, independent sources. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your drafts to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can develope the articles with minimal disruption. When you feel the articles meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus are ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk)10:13, 1 May 2019 (UTC)Reply


Your submission at Articles for creation: Q School 2019 – Event 1 (May 1) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (barksniff) 16:34, 1 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Q School 2019 – Event 2 (May 1) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (barksniff) 16:34, 1 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Please stop adding live updates to snooker tournament articles edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that you are one of several editors who are the subject of a discussion on the 2019 World Championship Talk page. You have been persistently adding live frame-by-frame updates to the match scores in direct contravention of WP:LIVESCORES, which clearly states "The current consensus is to not add visible match or frame scores to an article until the match is completed." You have ignored requests to stop this disruptive editing and failed to take part in the discussion. We are looking at measures to prevent the practice of live score updates, which may require admin involvement. Rodney Baggins (talk) 13:54, 3 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Q School 2019 – Event 1 (May 11) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Zppix were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 21:43, 11 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Bai Langning moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Bai Langning, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~GMCmc {talk to me} 19:24, 12 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve 2019 World Cup (snooker) edit

Hello, Piotras18,

Thanks for creating 2019 World Cup (snooker)! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 14:56, 26 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Louis Heathcote page edit

Hi how are you ?. Are you going to create a page like you have done for Riley Parsons ?. regards 178.167.220.34 (talk) 17:29, 29 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Steve Judd moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Steve Judd, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Snowycats (talk) 16:11, 1 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Steve Judd moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Steve Judd, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 03:41, 2 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

it really is annoying edit

You should be banned from editing. How many times have you been asked to add info when adding century breaks how are people to know what you are doing ?. Other people have complained about this also 92.251.160.246 (talk) 20:36, 27 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for June 29 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Snooker world ranking points 2019/2020, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2017 European Masters (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:55, 29 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Taking out of world snooker template edit

Hi! Just a quick question - why are you changing external links out of the World snooker template such as here? I thought the template was preferable as we can fix old diffs and they link with wikidata. Anything I've missed? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 14:44, 30 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Excessive cleanup edit

Your cleanup of problematic cuetracker.net links is appreciated, however you should not be deleting other article content that doesn't involve the blacklisted links identification e.g. this edit of Karl Broughton inappropriately removed a BLP sourcing issue template and other content that was not related to blacklisted links. Please keep any such deletions focused to the issue at hand. Dl2000 (talk) 23:39, 3 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Steve Judd has been accepted edit

 
Steve Judd, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 20:18, 11 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Johnathan Bagley for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Johnathan Bagley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johnathan Bagley until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pichpich (talk) 20:37, 18 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Riley Parsons for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Riley Parsons is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riley Parsons until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dom from Paris (talk) 11:49, 25 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Si Jiahui for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Si Jiahui is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Si Jiahui until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dom from Paris (talk) 11:51, 25 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

DYK for 2019 Riga Masters edit

On 7 September 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2019 Riga Masters, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2019 Riga Masters. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, 2019 Riga Masters), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 14:03, 7 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve 2019 World Open (snooker) edit

Hello, Piotras18,

Thank you for creating 2019 World Open (snooker).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please add some references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Path slopu}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

PATH SLOPU 11:21, 2 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

century breaks edit

you added a century for hossein vafaei after i added it.you add no bio,you have been told about this before. are you just lazy ?

can you create a wiki page for Riley Parsons the snooker player please?. edit

i will add all the info for his career,is that ok please ?. Regards 178.167.160.57 (talk) 18:13, 17 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

you keep adding century breaks to player's pages that have already been added ! edit

You made two mistakes yesterday, not the first time i may add. Other people add centuries do you think you could check first ?. 31.200.172.81 (talk) 11:12, 4 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for February 18 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Welsh Open (snooker), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Newport.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 18 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Ben Jones (snooker player) for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ben Jones (snooker player) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Jones (snooker player) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Montgomery15 (talk) 22:18, 30 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Gary Thomson (snooker player) for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gary Thomson (snooker player) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gary Thomson (snooker player) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 11:18, 6 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Victor Sarkis edit

 

The article Victor Sarkis has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 1 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Victor Sarkis moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Victor Sarkis, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 21:47, 25 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Jenson Kendrick moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Jenson Kendrick, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GPL93 (talk) 15:35, 2 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jenson Kendrick (June 5) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 12:02, 5 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jenson Kendrick (June 13) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 19:27, 13 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Steve Judd for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Steve Judd is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Judd until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 10:56, 3 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Richard Somauroo for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Richard Somauroo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Somauroo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 11:07, 3 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Jenson Kendrick edit

  Hello, Piotras18. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jenson Kendrick, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 8 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Jenson Kendrick edit

 

Hello, Piotras18. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Jenson Kendrick".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 15:33, 8 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Victor Sarkis edit

  Hello, Piotras18. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Victor Sarkis, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:08, 1 April 2024 (UTC)Reply