Duplicate images uploaded edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Kohlhcky1.JPG. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Kohlhcky1.jpg. The copy called Image:Kohlhcky1.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 20:15, 27 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

File source problem with File:Iphone1.gif edit

 
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Iphone1.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:42, 28 July 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:42, 28 July 2009 (UTC)Reply


File copyright problem with File:Iphone1.gif edit

 
File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Iphone1.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:42, 28 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

License tagging for File:Students Rush Feild at Camp Randall After Beating Number 1 OSU.JPG edit

Thanks for uploading File:Students Rush Feild at Camp Randall After Beating Number 1 OSU.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:05, 22 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Citing yourself edit

Hi Patrick. I'd like to let you know that citing your own work tends to be slightly frowned upon here. While it's not strictly prohibited, it's generally best to propose such citations on an article's talk page and then let the community decide whether the article merits inclusion.

This is not at all to say that you've done anything wrong, only to let you know this place has lots of rules and unwritten norms. Pretty much like a university when you think about it.

It's great that you're here -- we need more people with subject matter expertise in climate. I've been around this place for a long time so if you have any questions about how Wikipedia works just ask. Shock Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 16:40, 24 November 2016 (UTC)Reply