Autonomics edit

Autonomics refers to the ever-changing economics of the automotive industry[1] and the bailout measures in effect from the Obama administration.[2]

It describes the changes this industry is experiencing due to state of the economy, the automakers' products and strategies, the price of oil, the environment, and more. Autonomics is important because as it changes it challenges the status quo of this largely static, well-established industry, especially in the United States.

Fundamental shifts in the automotive industry have taken place in recent years. Toyota recently surpassed General Motors as the largest manufacturer in the world. General Motors and Chrysler have asked the US Government for billions of dollars in loans to keep them operational. As the financial crisis continues, these pressures and forces will likely be more prominent.

Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth professor Chris Trimble describes autonomics as the ability to own a large vehicle but save money by buying a very small car, and only using the larger one when necessary[3]. Trimble takes a microeconomic approach to describing autonomics.

Drivers edit

Availability of credit and lending edit

The recent credit crunch has led to a reduction in the amount of funds available to firms and consumers. This has adversely affected the automotive industry, as not as many car loans have been available to the public since the crisis began.

Employment edit

In the US, in the past year, about 400,000 jobs have been lost. [4] In Michigan, home of the Big Three automakers, unemployment is at its highest since 1984, at 11.6%, with a loss of 69,000 manufacturing jobs.[5]

The Price of oil edit

Oil hit $147 per barrel in July 2008[6] and consumers paid much more for their gasoline than previously.

Environmental concerns edit

Consumers are becoming increasingly aware and concerned with pollution caused by cars. This has led to the introduction of green technologies. Electric and hydrogen cars have been around for decades [7] and are now gaining popularity. Models such as the Toyota Prius have been very successful. [8]

Globalization edit

China and India are playing a larger role in automotive manufacturing, both for domestic consumption and as suppliers to firms internationally.[9]

More affordable cars edit

On 23 March 2009, Tata launched the Nano, reportedly the world's cheapest car. This opens up opportunities to consumers that could not perviously afford to own a car in India. EconomyWatch.com refers to this as autonomics. [10]

References edit

Further Reading edit

[1] President-Elect and Autonomics


Patro


(talk) 05:07, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Guardian Health & Beauty (February 19) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. Onel5969 (talk) 19:43, 19 February 2015 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Patro, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 (talk) 19:43, 19 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Guardian Health & Beauty (February 24) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was: You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 22:58, 24 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Guardian Health & Beauty (March 8) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. Onel5969 (talk) 23:31, 8 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Guardian Health & Beauty edit

 

Hello, Patro. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Guardian Health & Beauty".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 19:23, 2 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Lane Patterson for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lane Patterson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lane Patterson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.   // Timothy :: talk  02:30, 6 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

  • Hello, my apologies for not leaving this note sooner. I was the editor that nominated the article for deletion. I genuinely hope you don't find this discouraging, although I know from experience this is hard to do. Please contribute to the discussion on the nomination page. It's certainly possible it will not be deleted if you make a good case for notability and others agree with you; I'm completely open to changing my mind if you convince me. Writing an article can be very difficult if you're new to Wikipedia and it often takes some time and experience before success. I'd be happy to request the article be moved to your draft space so you can continue to work on it; alternatively, you can post the sources on the nomination page or add them to the article for others to consider. If there is anything I can do to help, please let me know and I genuinely do hope you're not discouraged. Best wishes,   // Timothy :: talk  02:41, 10 August 2020 (UTC)Reply