First Userbox edit

My fist userbox was deemed in violation of Wikipedia licensing policies and was removed.


From ash931... I actually attend the school. Yup, I'm in 7th grade there. I'm going to update the article some more.

Teachers edit

Thanks for adding the sections about teachers to the school articles; however, please make note of your source for these lists. Thanks. --Chris Griswold () 04:37, 24 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Rogers CAPA edit

Hi, it's really cool of you to make that whole article about my school. We're featuring the article in an upcoming issue of the student newspaper. But, how do you know so much about the school? Did you go there? Are you just reading the website? Thanks A student -- 04:35, 2 December 2006 (UTC) 141.151.173.201

Thanx, I'd be more than happy to see it in the school paper. As for knowing about the school, I'm the father of an eighth-grade Stagecraft Major and my younger son just auditioned to enter Stagecraft next year. Some of the material I copied (with permission) from Mr. Thompson's web site (which is where I got the incorrect name for the student newspaper).
May I suggest you sign yourself up for a Wikipedia account and help add to the page?
Paschmitts 21:32, 2 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
I agree about registering, and I'm here as well to help. --Chris Griswold () 22:56, 2 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Taylor Allderdice High School edit

Hey there,

User:0-0-0-Destruct-0 has asked that I as an AMA, have a look at the Taylor Allderdice High School article and help him to explain some of the reasons why he feels that some of his points weren't entirely taken in by the others who help edit this article. I've updated it's talk page with some comments you may want to respond to, or may just find interesting. Thanks!

--•Elomis• 22:35, 6 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Pittsburgh Barnstar edit

  The Pittsburgh Barnstar
I hereby award you this Barnstar in recognition of your efforts to improve and organize Pittsburgh-related articles, particularly your work with the school articles. Thanks, Chris Griswold () 08:09, 7 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

I did my best edit

 This user attends or attended
DePaul University.



I took way too much time on this today, and I don't think it yet has a decent photo. --Chris Griswold () 04:25, 10 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanx, but I think this would be rejected too. My last attempt used a CC licensed DePaul flag from Flickr, but I was told that despite the image being OK, the flag itself was assumed to be copyrighted by DePaul and unusable in Userboxen. I would have to assume that since this picture contains DePaul banners, they would be copyright by DePaul and unusable as well. BTW, we can't even use the letters "DPU" in the Userbox as according to this trademark any use of those letters in reference to DePaul University is trademarked by the University. So as far as I can tell any recognizable image or logo associated with DePaul is copyrighted or trademarked by the University and therefore unusable in a Userbox. – Paschmitts 15:01, 10 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
There's a difference between the flag and a picture that contains a flag as one of its many elements. --Chris Griswold () 07:41, 13 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
The trademark link doesn't work right for me. Session expired. --Chris Griswold () 07:49, 13 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Allegheny County Airport edit

Just wanted to let you know why I changed the template back. Both templates lead to same thing and can be used to see the image with Google Earth. The thing about using the template without the "at" is that it doesn't duplicate the link in the top right hand side of the article. I guess I just think it looks better. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 09:59, 16 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

That page works with Google Maps. I'm talking about the new Wikipedia Layer in Google Earth which, according to this article by a GE developer, requires either {{coor title d}} or {{coor at d}} (or the dm and dms variants) to be included in that layer. I think that the decrease in cosmetics is worth the additional exposure of all things Pittsburgh to Google Earth users. – Paschmitts 13:39, 16 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
Ah, now I understand. I've seen the edite summary a few times but couldn't figure out what it ment as the coordinate link will alwasy lead to a Google Earth link. I left a message at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Airports/Infobox#Google earth to see if concensus could be reach to change the box. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 13:57, 16 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
Thanx. Being a Google Earth geek and a Wikipedia editor, I got pretty excited about this. I've been running around articles in WP:PGH and geotagging them like crazy. Anyway, thanx again for the consideration. – Paschmitts 14:04, 16 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

History of Pittsburgh - request for collaboration edit

I've put a lot of additional work into this article, based on feedback from when it was a Featured Article Candidate. Also updated the maps to give them a more standard appearance. I'm going to submit the article for peer review and then FAC again. Before I do, though, I need some help from the WikiProject Pittsburgh. Please take some time and help with these tasks:

  1. improve the article with changes, additions and deletions
  2. some stern proof-reading, please
  3. give it a quality/importance rating at Talk:History of Pittsburgh
  4. leave feedback at Talk:History of Pittsburgh

Thanks. I'll be leaving this note at the talk pages of the project members who have been most active in Pittsburgh-related articles. Tomcool 14:42, 27 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Upper St. Clair High School edit

Hey Paschmitts, Thanks for all of your work on the USCHS article! Any ideas on how to improve this article to the competitve level for a featured article?

Thanks,

Jeeps2009 02:25, 22 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Shucks! I've been running around a bunch of Pittsburgh's school articles and trying to improve them a little. Anyway, I recently discovered WikiProject Schools which has a number of great suggestions on how to improve school articles. – Paschmitts 20:30, 23 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Category Question edit

Thanks for adding Category:Parks in Pittsburgh to so many of the SE PA state park articles. Might I respectfully suggest that the category be renamed to something like "Parks in Greater Pittsburgh" or "Parks in the Pittsburgh Metropolitan Area"? When I think of Fayette County, PA for example, the first thing I think of is NOT Pittsburgh. Thanks, Ruhrfisch 20:27, 29 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, I was thinking that myself as I was adding to the cat. Maybe "Pittsburgh Area Parks"? I'll take this to the category talk page. – Paschmitts 22:07, 29 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Mt. Lebanon School District edit

Please take a look at these edits to this article. I trust your judgment and experience with these articles more than my own. Please call on me whenever you need my help. --Chris Griswold () 09:37, 4 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanx for bring it to my attention. I think it definitely needs cleaned up ;-). Certainly the phrase "the insane Upper St. Clair principal" violates WP:NPOV unless they can reference a clinical report on his mental health. I'll give it the once over and see what I can do. – Paschmitts 16:04, 4 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Sewickley Academy edit

When you have time, please take a look at this article and see what you can do. Thanks, Chris Griswold () 21:13, 6 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

I'll work on it soon. Unfortunately I agree with the spam you removed, there's too much sports there. It seems that sports is all many people can say about their school. – Paschmitts 00:57, 7 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Dealing with vandals edit

When you see vandalism, in addition to reverting it, please try to add warnings to the user's talk page. This allows other editors to know when a user is being a problem; informs the vandal that what they are doing is actually problematic, which they might not have understood; and moves the disciplinary process along so that the user can be blocked if necessary. Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace shows all of the applicable templates and when they are appropriate. In addition, I added a script that's available that changes my Wikipedia pages to make it easier to add these warnings, among many other features. If you are interested, let me know, and I will try to find the information on that for you. Thanks. --Chris Griswold () 22:54, 13 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

I had been trying to. But I started winding up on pages with dozens of warnings and figured "What's the point?" – Paschmitts 22:16, 19 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
The point is you can add to the page, or you can make a list of people who need to be blocked and give it to me and then I will block them. As an admin, I have more abilities here than you do, and I would like to use them to help you as much as I can. --Chris Griswold () 23:40, 19 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Could you take a look at User talk:Paperhat5789 and decide if he needs to be blocked? – Paschmitts 03:50, 21 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

I left a final warning. He screws around again, I block him. Oh, and do you think this user and another editing the same articles might be socks?--Chris Griswold () 07:11, 21 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
You may be right on that. Certainly Thomas Jefferson High School, Jefferson Hills, Pennsylvania is going around in the same circles, so I assume it's all the same person. And User talk:Staciitugwell has started uploading images from my personal web site, see Image:Lacinas-20mos-2.jpg. I think it's time to take stronger action with this person or group. – Paschmitts 19:35, 23 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

I hope none of the group are from the future or past; instead, I hope they dwell strictly in the present. That would tough to fight foes with TIME POWERS! SorcyMorsmann 20:30, 4 Marchuary 2007 (UTC)

Got him. Sorry, have been offline. Comcast takes a while. --Chris Griswold () 04:30, 6 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hey there, and thanks for the note on those sockpuppets. Any accounts which are making any of those similar edits I am now indef-blocking on sight, instead of waiting for repeat offenses. If you see any more of them, you're welcome to post them on my talk page, or if they're really obvious socks in need of quick attention then you can put a notice up on WP:AIV, perhaps with a link to one of the already-blocked socks so an admin can compare the contributions. Cheers. --PeruvianLlama(spit) 06:05, 9 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

(RE: More Vandals to be Blocked) One was already indef-blocked for choice of user name. The other three I have blocked as sockpuppets, or at least vandalism-only accounts. I left a note on the talk page of the admin who issued the one-week block, asking them to look into the matter again. It's their decision whether to extend the block or leave it as is. Thanks again for the notifications. --PeruvianLlama(spit) 18:01, 21 April 2007 (UTC)Reply


Thanks for removing some of the obviously ludicrous additions to the TJ page. I posted yesterday about needing to include citations or at least checks on the info currently present. I went to school there in the mid 1990s and I can assure you that some of the info even currently on the page is not correct. Where is this info from? Has it just been copied over and over from the original page creator (who looks to be one of the vandals)? Do you think maybe they have been playing one massive prank? I need to check on some of it myself, because it doesn't seem right. Please keep in touch. --TomNolder 11:03, 10 April 2007

WP Schools & WP Pittsburgh templates edit

I've added the nested option to Schools - looks like you already did the Pittsburgh one. Let me know if you have any problems using it. -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 01:52, 13 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Pittsburgh Promise.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Pittsburgh Promise.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:03, 6 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Relaunching WikiProject Pittsburgh meetups edit

You are receiving this message because you are a member of the WikiProject Pittsburgh. In the past we have discussed a meetup idea - let's see if we can make it a reality during the summer. Please see this thread for more information.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  23:22, 21 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Wikimedia Pennsylvania edit

Hello there!

I'm writing to inform you that we are now forming the first local Wikimedia Chapter in the United States: Wikimedia Pennsylvania. Our goals are to perform outreach and fundraising activities on behalf of the various Wikimedia projects. If you're interested in being a part of the chapter, or just want to know more, you can:

Thanks and I hope you join up! Cbrown1023 talk 04:07, 9 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:PPS Logo.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:PPS Logo.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Zedla 00:42, 4 December 2007 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ensign of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.gif edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Ensign of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:18, 1 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Roland W. Schmitt edit

 

An article that you have been involved in editing, Roland W. Schmitt, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roland W. Schmitt. Thank you. Jeepday (talk) 14:11, 1 February 2008 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Pennant of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.gif edit

Thank you for uploading Image:Pennant of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:33, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable fair use Image:Mark_Roosevelt.jpg edit

 
Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Mark_Roosevelt.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 22:59, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for File:Allegheny Co School Dists.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Allegheny Co School Dists.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:42, 18 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Pittsburgh edit

 

Hello Paschmitts, this message is being sent on behalf of WikiProject Pittsburgh. You have previously signed up as a member and we are currently trying to determine any members that have become inactive or no longer care to be a member. If you still wish to be on the member list, please sign your name here. Thank you, on behalf of the project, Grsz11 17:34, 13 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Pittsburgh event for Wikipedia's tenth anniversary edit

Hi! Since you're a member of WikiProject Pittsburgh, I wanted to invite you to the Wikipedia Tenth Anniversary celebrations we're having in Pittsburgh on Saturday, January 15. During the daytime, we're going to be having a photo contribution drive where anyone can bring in their digital photos or prints and Wikipedians will teach people how to upload them and add them to articles, and maybe introduction to Wikipedia workshops as well. Then in the evening, we'll have fun at the Carson City Saloon. There will be free Wikipedia t-shirts and other goodies, as well. See the Pittsburgh meetup page for more details. I hope to see you there!--ragesoss (talk) 14:34, 1 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:WikiProject Pittsburgh activity edit

Wikipedia:WikiProject Pittsburgh is rolling out some new features (see our discussion at WT:PITTSBURGH). We are also trying to determine how many members are active. If you could go to Wikipedia:WikiProject Pittsburgh/Members and move your name from inactive to the active or semi-active group (depending on your interest in Pittsburgh issue and overall activity) groups, this would be great. Hopefully in a near future you'll also receive our first newsletter with various information on what we have been doing, and what useful tools are available. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 19:52, 26 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Pittsburgh meetup edit

Pittsburgh Wikipedians are invited to a meet up on April 3, 2015. Meetup Pittsburgh

  Bfpage |leave a message  19:51, 1 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Invitation edit

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge edit

  You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:39, 8 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, Paschmitts. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, Paschmitts. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, Paschmitts. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Coordinators and help needed edit

  Hi, if you are active on Wikipedia and are still interested in helping out with urgent tasks on our large Schools Project, please let us know here. We look forward to hearing from you.


Sent to project members 13:58, 29 August 2021 (UTC). You can opt of messages here.