User talk:Paleface Jack/Archive 5

Your GA nomination of I Drink Your Blood

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article I Drink Your Blood you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of J Milburn -- J Milburn (talk) 21:20, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

Good to hear.--Paleface Jack (talk) 21:26, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Begotten (film)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Begotten (film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of NowIsntItTime -- NowIsntItTime (talk) 04:20, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up.--Paleface Jack (talk) 15:56, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Silent Hill

Hi,

I saw that you added a tag about needing to update the Silent Hill article. You mentioned a new game announced, (which is quite the news!), but I'm having difficulty finding what you alluded to. Could you send a source for the upcoming game, please? Best wishes, Rapunzel-bellflower (talk) 23:26, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Sure thing.--Paleface Jack (talk) 16:50, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

The Man in the Shadows

Hi Jack, could you be a little more specific about what needs to be done on this article's Reception section to 'pass muster'? I think I fairly represented the spectrum of criticism from least liked to most liked, etc.? Do you feel some of the free indirect discourse sounds like editorial POV rather than summarizing a critic's POV? It's a long section so I'd like to know what I've done that's off -- most of the Reception articls I've done do not seem to have attracted a full-rewrite tag. ZarhanFastfire (talk) 20:13, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Begotten (film)

The article Begotten (film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Begotten (film) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of NowIsntItTime -- NowIsntItTime (talk) 03:41, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

Review #2 of Begotten (film)

To: Paleface Jack
Copy: NowIsntItTime

Dear Jack,

As you requested, I have reviewed the present article and would like to congratulate you on the excellent job done by you, with additional forensic advice from our colleague NowIsntItTime in the above section; well done!

Since you asked me to copy edit the current version of the article, I'd be happy to do so and have spotted a few things I could reword slightly, though nothing major. However, the following item, in Cast, would still benefit from further improvements on your part, as I'd prefer to defer to your subject matter expertise.

Cast

The last paragraph was confusing to me, as I first thought the word direct was a verb but then I concluded it might be a typo of director, considering that the verb in this long sentence seems to be provided, which appears quite late:

Members of writer, producer, direct Edmund Elias Merhige's theatre company Theatre of Material which included Adolpho Vargas, Arthur Streeter, Daniel Harkins, Erik Slavin, James Gandia, Michael Phillips, and Terry Andersen provided additional credits for other characters in the film such as the Nomads and Robed Figures.

Perhaps the following rewrite might work better, since the reader will already know much about Merhige's multiple activities in this work (he is also already wikilinked in the lead section):

"Members of Merhige's theatre company Theatre of Material – which included Adolpho Vargas, Arthur Streeter, Daniel Harkins, Erik Slavin, James Gandia, Michael Phillips, and Terry Andersen – provided additional credits for other characters in the film such as the Nomads and Robed Figures."

But I'll let you decide what that paragraph should read like.

The only other item for you to reconsider is the structure of sections in the article's back matter.

Currently, you have the following structure:

See also

Notes - containing additional notes that expand on the inline prose

References - containing a list of all sources (13 books with ISBNs, plus lots of websites)

Citations - citations referring back to the books and websites

Further reading

Without prejudice to the advice previously given by our colleague NowIsntItTime, I would suggest you consider the following structure, per MOS:NOTES:

See also

References

Notes - containing additional notes that expand on the inline prose

Citations - citations referring back to the books and websites

Sources - containing a list of all sources (13 books with ISBNs, plus lots of websites)

Further reading

I hope this visual example will make sense. If in doubt, please look at the example of the article on the 1959 film Ben-Hur (which has Bibliography instead of Sources as a section heading, seeing as most of its contents are indeed books).

I hope this helps for now. When you've considered (and possibly applied) the above changes, I'll return to the article and apply the copy editing you requested, which shouldn't take me very long.
With kind regards for now;
Patrick. ツ Pdebee.^{(talk)(become old-fashioned!)} 17:48, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up! I took care of the changes you mentioned, so hopefully, that all helps. Don't know what would be worthwhile to post as a possible DYK.--Paleface Jack (talk) 18:26, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

To: Jack
Copy: Ryan

Dear Jack,

Speedy good work; well done. I'll do the copy editing first thing tomorrow morning (UK time), as I am needed elsewhere this evening. I'll send you another update when I am done; thank you for your patience with me, Jack.
By copy to Ryan: Long time no speak; hope you are keeping well? If my memory is correct, I think it was you who advised me some time ago about DYK, but I can't remember where or when. Please may I impose on you and ask you to advise Jack on what to select from the subject article, for posting as a possible DYK? I also seem to remember that there was a timing factor involved but, again, I don't remember the details. Thank you so much for any assistance you can extend to Jack.
With kind regards for now;
Patrick. ツ Pdebee.^{(talk)(become old-fashioned!)} 20:01, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Hey there, Pdebee and Jack. Happy to help if you want it. Nice job getting this to GA -- it's one that's actually been on my watchlist (as in movies to watch, not the WP watchlist) for some years now. The article automatically qualifies for DYK since it just passed GA and has not previously appeared on the main page. There is a rather strict 7 day time limit from the day/time it was promoted to GA to submit the nomination. You'll want to pull out one or two of the most interesting facts for the "hook", being sure that they are directly supported by sources. For an article like this, there's no shortage of interesting bits you could choose. Feel free to ping with any specific questions if you want. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 21:28, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Rhododendrites I'm still a bit confused as to the sources format even after looking over the guidelines. Perhaps you can clarify this for me. Sincerely, --Paleface Jack (talk)

I'm not sure what you mean by sources format? In the article or in the DYK? There is a suggestion that you include the source along with the hook, but it's not a requirement. As long as the claim is sourced in the article, you can include it as a hook in the DYK. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 23:14, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

To: Jack
Copy: NowIsntItTime

Dear Jack,
 Done!
I have just completed the copy editing you requested, which took longer than I anticipated but there was more to do than seemed at first glance. However, I have mainly polished the existing content and most of my changes were tiny things (like straightening curly apostrophes, etc.) and I have attempted to preserve as much as the existing content as possible, while trying to add value to the prose by removing repetitions and streamlining the flow of the text. All my edit summaries will enable you to assess quite easily the changes I have applied and, if there is anything with which you might disagree, then it should be quite straightforward for you to change it back manually, since I don't tend to group too many changes in a single edit. By the way, I have also checked the hyphens in all your 'isbn=' parameters and am very impressed that they were all correct!
I wish you well in your goal to achieve FA, and thank you once again for asking me to participate.
With kind regards:
Patrick. ツ Pdebee.^{(talk)(become old-fashioned!)} 00:41, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Suggested peer review for Begotten

Hi Paleface Jack. I forgot to mention/suggest this in the review, but maybe you should submit the article for a peer review? I recently found out when I had the article Roar reviewed for Good Article that a peer review can be submitted for areas that the article may be lacking in substance, or information that it needs to pass. Of course, this is entirely optional, but I thought that I should bring this to your attention before I forgot. -NowIsntItTime^{(chats)(doings)} 20:58, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Way ahead of you friend, I got someone to do some copy editing for me and they have completed it all just recently. Thanks for the mentioning though.--Paleface Jack (talk) 18:45, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Congratulations!

I noticed that you finally got Begotten (film) to GA status. Great work. Cheers, DarkKnight2149 21:05, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Thanks.--Paleface Jack (talk) 16:25, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

An Wikiproject Film Award for you! ... ;-)) ...

Dear Jack,
I had planned to award you a Film Barnstar once Begotten had made it to FA. However, since I just noticed that you copied the Reviewer Barnstar I awarded to our colleague NowIsntItTime for all the GA Review support he extended to you, I am pleased to award you with your own Film Barnstar now, ahead of time. Congratulations, Jack, and please keep up the good work.
With kind regards;
Patrick. ツ Pdebee.^{(talk)(become old-fashioned!)} 19:11, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
(PS: Please note that these awards are generally personalized to the recipient only; thank you.)

Hahaha! My bad. Thanks for that! I am presently working on some of my revision drafts (My M.O. when doing major rewrites and expansions), you're willing to work on any of them if you'd like. Again thanks for all the help and support. Happy editing!--Paleface Jack (talk) 20:26, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of I Drink Your Blood

The article I Drink Your Blood you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:I Drink Your Blood for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of J Milburn -- J Milburn (talk) 12:22, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

A heads up.

Dear Jack,
This is just to say that there has been activity at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Begotten (film)/archive1, which requires your involvement, as I’ve done all I can. Good luck. Patrick. ツ Pdebee.^{(talk)(become old-fashioned!)} 10:05, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Din of Celestial Birds, Sep 2006, film poster.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Din of Celestial Birds, Sep 2006, film poster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

Merry Merry!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2020!

Hello Paleface Jack, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2020. Happy editing, ★Trekker (talk) 13:58, 21 December 2019 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Thank you once again for all your work on horror related pages. You're a gem.★Trekker (talk) 13:58, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

Thanks alot friend.--Paleface Jack (talk) 16:59, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Begotten (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jason Wood (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:39, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Happy Holidays!

Have a great rest of your holiday season! If you do not, then you should know that I have acquired a very particular set of skills on my time on Wikipedia. Skills that make me a nightmare for people who do not enjoy themselves. If you do not have a great time this year, I will find you... And I will block you.

But seriously, happy holidays. DarkKnight2149 21:56, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Din of Celestial Birds, Sep 2006, film poster.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Din of Celestial Birds, Sep 2006, film poster.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Din of Celestial Birds, Sep 2006, film poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Din of Celestial Birds, Sep 2006, film poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:28, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Din of Celestial Birds, 2006 short film, screenshot.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Din of Celestial Birds, 2006 short film, screenshot.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Begotten (film)

Hello! Your submission of Begotten (film) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 01:10, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 00:58, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Begotten (film)

On 26 January 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Begotten (film), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 1989 film Begotten was made to resemble what the director called "a time that predates spoken language"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Begotten (film). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Begotten (film)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

Precious

Begotten (film)

Thank you for quality articles about films such as Begotten, I Drink Your Blood, and The Hideous Sun Demon, for expanding stubs that suit your expertise, for service from 2013, for talk instead of templates, - cinephile with the honorific suffix Paleface Jack, you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no. 2334 of Precious, a prize of QAI. Did you know that just a few days ago, I referred to Jack the Ripper? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:46, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

Thanks.--Paleface Jack (talk) 16:55, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

The Thing (extraterrestrial)

Hi there. I don't know what are your plans about this, but I would like to help if that's okay with you too. Have a good day. −αΣn=1NDi[n][Σj∈C{i}Fji[n − 1]+Fexti[(n^−1)] 08:06, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Go on ahead. I am currently working on a full load at the moment, but I will occasionally drop by and check on the progress. Thanks for letting me know.--Paleface Jack (talk) 18:59, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for the reply. I think that this page, which I recently edited a bit, can be promoted to good/featured article status. I guess it still has some deficiencies. Would you please review it and express your ideas in your spare time? Have a nice day. −αΣn=1NDi[n][Σj∈C{i}Fji[n − 1]+Fexti[(n^−1)] 18:44, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Billy (Black Christmas) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Billy (Black Christmas). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 23:36, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Billy (Black Christmas) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Billy (Black Christmas). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 23:38, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Discuss at Talk:Black Christmas (1974 film). The draft should almost certainly be accepted, but should be discussed on the talk page of the existing article first. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:39, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Discuss at Deletion Review. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:16, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft talk:Move Billy (Black Christmas)

Hello, Paleface Jack,

I saw your objection on this page concerning the deletion of Draft:Move Billy (Black Christmas). But I wanted to let you know that this was simply a redirect page. The content concerning this subject can be found at Billy Lenz which is currently also a redirect, to Black Christmas (1974 film). But if you look at the edit history of the Billy Lenz page, you can find content that was removed when the page was turned into a redirect. Draft:Move Billy (Black Christmas) didn't have any useful content. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:46, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

That's Fine. Feel free to check on the draft.--Paleface Jack (talk) 23:51, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Billy (Black Christmas) has been accepted

Billy (Black Christmas), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:23, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Head Hunter (2019 film) has been accepted

The Head Hunter (2019 film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 20:45, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

Quick question

In the Horror Films of the 70s book, what score did the author give The Day Time Ended? GamerPro64 00:42, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

He Gave it a score of 2/4,(page 595) and criticized the plot as being incoherent, and acting. (Pages 597-598).

DYK for Billy (Black Christmas)

On 2 April 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Billy (Black Christmas), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was unlike in many slasher film antagonists, the true identity and motivations of the character Billy in Black Christmas were never revealed? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Billy (Black Christmas). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Billy (Black Christmas)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Wug·a·po·des​ 01:16, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Stephen Dee Richards

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Stephen Dee Richards you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 13:21, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Stephen Dee Richards

The article Stephen Dee Richards you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Stephen Dee Richards for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 10:20, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Stephen Dee Richards

The article Stephen Dee Richards you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Stephen Dee Richards for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 11:01, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Stephen Dee Richards

On 25 May 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Stephen Dee Richards, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Kearney County Gazette reportedly displayed the skull of 19th-century serial killer Stephen Dee Richards in their window? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Stephen Dee Richards. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Stephen Dee Richards), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:01, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Billy (Black Christmas)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Billy (Black Christmas) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Daniel Case -- Daniel Case (talk) 02:41, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Billy (Black Christmas)

The article Billy (Black Christmas) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Billy (Black Christmas) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Daniel Case -- Daniel Case (talk) 05:41, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Billy (Black Christmas)

The article Billy (Black Christmas) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Billy (Black Christmas) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Daniel Case -- Daniel Case (talk) 04:21, 6 August 2020 (UTC)