Oxygene7-13

MalnadachBot

A cookie for you!

Om nom nom nom nom! DottyMcFear13 (talk) 15:02, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

This user loves to play darts?

How can you love something wich you suck at? At least against me that is ;P DottyMcFear13 (talk) 16:18, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Maybe because I'm stubborn? Oxygene7-13 (talk) 16:48, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Twenty 4 Seven article: waned

Hi, I saw that you reverted 'waned' back to 'wanted' in the Twenty 4 Seven article. As your user page states that you have an intermediate level of English, I thought I should let you know that the correct word in the sentence is waned. 'Wane' is a verb meaning a decrease or decline (e.g. see http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/waned?s=t ). In the context of the sentence in the article, it means that the group's popularity declined. 'Wanted' does not make sense in that sentence. I am changing it back (it was originally 'waned', but then someone changed it to 'wanted' recently, and I changed it back).Nqr9 (talk) 11:13, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Re; Golf game

It's okay, many make that mistake when they're new to the website.

On to your question - you're restricted even from Google? None the less, Wikipedia is generally for writing articles, or talking about writing articles, not just posing questions, so there's not a ton of options for this. I think you can pose random questions at the Reference Desk, probably specifically the Entertainment one, although I'm not sure how well that works. I've never used it - I've never understood its purpose when you've got search engines like Google at your disposal. Also, as a reader, you could always look through the titles listed at Category:Golf video games to see if any of those titles listed sound like the game you're talking about. Sergecross73 msg me 16:39, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

First: Yes, I'm restricted from Google... and yeah, I've checked the list of golf-games and I couldn't find what I'm looking for. About the use of talk-pages: On the Dutch Wikipedia, you're free to discuss whatever you like, where the discussions go completely off-topic sometimes. And no-one cares as long as you don't start a war... But, I'll try Reference Desk for further questions. Thanx for responding. Oxygene7-13 (talk) 16:57, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for sharing - that is interesting, I didn't know that about the Dutch Wikipedia. The different language's Wikipedias act independently from one another though, and from what I've gathered, the English one can be the strictest when it comes to guidelines and policies, so that does make sense. Anyways, best of luck in your search. Sergecross73 msg me 17:36, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Jmjelectronica2.jpg

Greetings. Please remember that under WP:NFCC#9 it is not OK to use non-free images outside of articlespace. I've thus removed this file from your user sandbox.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:34, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

I use these pictures for private-use only. Due to restrictions I do not like to explain further, I do not even have the possibility to put these pictures online, even if I wanted to... (I'm restricted by a white-list) Am I allowed to do this? They'll end up on my harddrive and that's were they'll stay. If this is somehow of a problem, please let me know. With kind regards: Oxygene7-13 (talk) 19:44, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

PROBLEM

I got a problem, i got a message from the French Wikipedia page, but i don't have a French Wikipedia page. i cheked it and found that somebody made a page but when i enter my own name and password i stil get this page i didn't make. how is this possible, can you tell me please, because i don't understand how this could happen..? please give me a answer, you know where to find me. MartinVisser1974 14:11, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Isn't that just a welcome from some other user? All wikipedia's are linked, My account also excists on every other Wikipedia without me ever being on them... I don't understand the problem really... OXYGENE 7-13 (TALKPAGE) 16:46, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Oxygene7-13. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page.
Message added 16:45, 7 June 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Stefan2 (talk) 16:45, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Oxygene7-13! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 20:10, Wednesday, November 16, 2016 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Dinner for one traditie

Op welke tv zender wordt Dinner for One dan elk jaar met oud en nieuw uitgezonden? Ik heb er namelijk nog nooit van gehoord dat dit een traditie zou zijn of überhaupt elk jaar uitgezonden wordt. Ook op google gaat alles dat ik vind over de duitse traditie. --83.128.126.218 (talk) 13:21, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Ik had al aangegeven dat vele nederlanders het kijken op de duitse televisie en de zenders zijn dus de ARD en de ZDF. Ikzelf woon aan de Duitse grens wat er waarschijnlijk aan heeft bijgedragen dat ik het filmpje al van huis uit ken. Het is op zijn minst bekend in het gehele grensgebied maar ik vermoed dat het ook verder landinwaarts wel een zekere bekendheid geniet. Ik snap dat vermoedens niet bepaald de beste bronnen zijn maar de zin die ik had aangevuld ging er ook over waar het bekend was, niet per sé een traditie. (er is trouwens een Nederlandse versie met Joop Doderer beter bekend als Swiebertje) OXYGENE 7-13 (TALKPAGE) 17:14, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Oh ik had die oorspronkelijk edit van jou heel niet gezien, zag het alleen in het artikel staan. Maar ik vind het toch erg vergezocht om van een noemswaardige bekendheid in Nederland te spreken omdat er hier wel eens mensen naar de Duitse tv kijken. Ik denk dat de kijkcijfers van duitse tv in Nederland echt heel minimaal zijn, en misschien dat het vroeger wel meer geweest is in de grensregio waar de duitse zenders nog bereik hadden (sowieso bepaald geen dichtbevolkt gebied), voor er kabeltelevisie en commerciele zenders waren (40 jaar geleden?) maar het lijkt me echt sterk dat er significante aantallen nederlanders hun oudejaarsavond besteedden met het kijken van een engelse sketch uit het jaar 0 op de duitse televisie. Ik zou dit dus toch willen weghalen tenzij je met een betrouwbare bron komt, ondanks dat jij het misschien wel keek. --83.128.126.218 (talk) 18:56, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Ik word beperkt door een white-list en kan daardoor dus geen bronnen aandragen maar het feit dat er Nederlandse versie is, gespeeld door één van 's Neerlands bekendste akteurs van zijn tijd, wil toch wel íets zeggen? OXYGENE 7-13 (TALKPAGE) 19:15, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Mwah, Viva Hollandia is gejat van Viva Colonia, maar niemand in Nederland die het orgineel kent. Wij houden van Oranje is gejat van Auld lang syne maar vraag maar eens hoeveel mensen die laatste kennen. En het lijkt er niet op dat die sketch met joop doderer veel bekendheid geniet (80.000 views op youtube) --83.128.126.218 (talk) 19:27, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Maar anders dan halen we Nederland wel weg uit die zin in de openingsparagraaf maar zetten we die versie met joop doderer onder het kopje 'different versions'?--83.128.126.218 (talk) 19:29, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Kan... maar dat vond IK dan weer net te veel van 't goeie. OXYGENE 7-13 (TALKPAGE) 19:31, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Dus, consensus?--83.128.126.218 (talk) 19:37, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Gezien het feit dat de zin alleen maar zegt dat het filmpje bekend is in de volgende landen, is mijn persoonlijke mening; gewoon Nederland in de zin laten staan, punt. (maar wie ben ik!?) OXYGENE 7-13 (TALKPAGE) 19:58, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Moet wel een zekere noemswaardige bekendheid zijn, anders kun je elk land wel op die lijst zetten, en ik denk dat als je het 20 mensen op straat vraagt misschien hooguit één iemand het kent.--83.128.126.218 (talk) 20:17, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Dan gaan we toch voor jouw laatste optie? Maak ik echt niet zo´n probleem van. OXYGENE 7-13 (TALKPAGE) 20:19, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Okay--83.128.126.218 (talk) 20:21, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your question at the Help desk

	Hello Oxygene7-13. Replies have been posted to your question at the Help desk. If the problem is solved, please place {{Resolved|1=~~~~}} at the top of the section. Thank you!
	Message added on 17:49, 5 May 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{helpdeskreply}} template.

Discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Electronic music#Sub-project EDM

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Electronic music#Sub-project EDM as a participant of WP:WikiProject Electronic music. - TheMagnificentist 13:43, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Oxygene7-13. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

AFD Comment

Hi there. I appreciate your participation at AFD, but comments like this don’t really help. Liking an article doesn’t help. Comments like that are generally ignored by the closing admin. If you want to have your stance counted, you’ll want to give a reason based on policy or precedent. See WP:ATA for more arguments to stay away from. Sergecross73 msg me 13:22, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

@Sergecross73: Thanks for pointing that out. I changed my comment to be a bit more constructive. Oxygene7-13 (talk) 15:39, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Username commentary

Please refrain from comments such as this (and the others you have made today). They are not helpful and only serve to egg on editors who make such accounts.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:38, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

@Ponyo: I know my behaviour looks worse than intended. I try to lure them with a funny/dumb remark so later on, I can convince them to behave more exceptable. Check this conversation for example. I promise I'll behave. Oxygene7-13 (talk) 12:05, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Oxygene7-13 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Oxygene7-13 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

---

Block message:

Autoblocked...

• Blocking administrator: not provided.

---

Decline reason: Between the CU results, the example linked above, and the edit questioning another user's former name, I agree with zzuuzz. I will not remove the autoblock, and I certainly won't entertain your request for IPBE. —DoRD (talk)​ 16:41, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

I share this IP with 100 others. On the Dutch Wiki I am IP-block exempt to keep me out of trouble caused by others. Oxygene7-13 (talk) 10:55, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Note this is one for checkusers. There'll be no IPBE here today. I strongly recommend you withdraw this request, let the autoblock expire, and not let it happen again. Unless you want to contest the block and let people really probe the details you haven't included. I suspect that may not work out well. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 14:48, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

But the block is "indefinite", isn't it? Oxygene7-13 (talk) 14:50, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

The last time I looked, autoblocks expire in 24 hours (from the last 'hit'). If not, I'll disable it myself after that time. That might mean, take a break. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 14:54, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

OK, thanx a lot! I usually behave pretty brave and did not see this one coming. Can I ask for an "IPblock-exempt" like I have/am on the Dutch Wikipedia? Oxygene7-13 (talk) 14:56, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Considering what's happened here, the answer's going to be no. I've also disabled your unblock request for you, in your own interests. See how easily we're amused by this stuff. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 15:14, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Knowing this is gonna sound a lot like "my little brother did it" but I share this IP with a 100 others... But, what makes the answer "no"? ...and what did you mean by "See how easily we're amused"? Oxygene7-13 (talk) 15:24, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

I've seen the checkuser data. Either you know what's going on here, or you don't. If you know then I have no sympathy, and neither will anyone else, and there's no reason for IPBE. I'm assuming - best case scenario - that there was some comedy gone badly wrong, hence the lack of amusement. If you don't know, then I take it all back and you're welcome to take your chances with another unblock request (but see my advice above). -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 15:33, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Seriously, it wasn't me. I'm at a psychiatric hospital and all 100 of us have access to these computers. Believe me, this isn't my kind of humor. Wich template do I need to do it right? Oxygene7-13 (talk) 16:00, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

As you wish. Please see the instructions at Template:Autoblock -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 16:02, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

I tried but it looks like I'm keep getting the wrong templates... Would you be so kind..? Oxygene7-13 (talk) 16:08, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Checkuser needed. This will do the same trick. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 16:09, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Thnx. Oxygene7-13 (talk) 16:11, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

I feel sick to my stomach about this... I must have left the computer without logging off. I tend to forget that so once in a while. That weird question must have been asked by that same guy. Oxygene7-13 (talk) 17:23, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

What about this question? Or this one? Were they also left by someone else? —DoRD (talk)​ 17:27, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

wow... I told you I tend to forget to log off but this is ridiculous... I'm gonna fry this dude! I checked my history and indeed, this looks bad. ...and I already mentioned that this is going to look like "my little brother did it".Oxygene7-13 (talk) 17:30, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

So, what about this, this, this, and a number of other "username questions" from this account? If they were all made by some other person then this account has been compromised, and I will have to block it. —DoRD (talk)​ 17:47, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

I understand just too well how this looks and I fully understand your decision on this. Too bad but it is what it is. Now I'm off murdering someone though! Oxygene7-13 (talk) 17:51, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

April 2019

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it is suspected that it has been compromised. If your account is locked, please contact cawikimedia.org. Otherwise, if you are able to confirm that you are the user who created this account, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section), then add this below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=your reason here ~~~~}}.—DoRD (talk)​ 17:53, 23 April 2019 (UTC)