Olusola David, Ayibiowu

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Olusola David, Ayibiowu/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 18:46, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Use of multiple usernames

Hello Olusola David, Ayibiowu. You appear to be using different usernames - this one and Olusola D, Ayibiowu. I have to point out that it is against our username policy to use more than one username. Doing this makes it difficult to identify the totality of contributions made by an editor, and makes it uncertain whether messages posted to a user's talk page will be seen. I have posted a similar message to the other talk page and would urge you to choose one of the two usernames and edit under that only. Thank you: Noyster (talk), 15:57, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Olusola David, Ayibiowu has been accepted

Olusola David, Ayibiowu, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 04:18, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Olusola David, Ayibiowu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Olusola David, Ayibiowu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olusola David, Ayibiowu until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Justeditingtoday (talk) 13:45, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

February 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Olusola David, Ayibiowu, you may be blocked from editing. Stop your vandalism. All material must be referenced. Wikipedia cannot be used as a reference. Do not destroy the infobox as you are doing things wrong. Bgwhite (talk) 01:52, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as you did at Olusola David, Ayibiowu. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  Bgwhite (talk) 00:18, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Olusola David, Ayibiowu, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

: Noyster (talk), 13:40, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Olusola David, Ayibiowu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #17480 was submitted on Feb 07, 2017 18:24:50. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 18:24, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Olusola David, Ayibiowu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Requests for Delete ReviewOlusola David, Ayibiowu (talk) 02:15, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I don't see any reason for unblock in the message below. If you are asking for a WP:Standard Offer unblock, you have to wait for the six months first, and then request it (having not edited, from any account or not logged in, for the duration). If you have "significant new information" that you think would justify an unblock now, then present it here and not on the blocking admin's talk page, in a new unblock request. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:03, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• Requests for Delete Review (DRV)

Dear Administrator, I saw that my Olusola David, Ayibiowu Article for deletion has been deleted and closed 02:05, 10 February 2017 Kuryk .

But there is an unusual good insight into the circumstances that led to the block. And a significant new information has come to light since we started the discussion (AFD) that led to the Standard Offer given to me from CheckUser which would be pending…

• I should Wait six months, without sockpuppetry

• I Promise to avoid the behavior that led to the block

Before I could come back to editing to improve and make meaningful contributions which is already in progress.

In Assume good faith I would appeal for Delete Review (DRV).

Here is the below message that was sent to my e-mail from the Unblock Review Team.

Hello Olusola David, Ayibiowu,

A CheckUser has reviewed your case and confirmed that you are indeed engaging in sockpuppetry. As long as you keep creating new accounts, we will keep blocking them. If you want to return to editing in a legitimate way, the Standard Offer is available to you.

5 albert square

English Wikipedia Administrator

Unblock Review TeamOlusola David, Ayibiowu (talk) 02:15, 11 February 2017 (UTC).

• Request for unblock-auto.

Olusola David, Ayibiowu because of this Request for Delete Review. As I tried to send message to the Checkuser or User talk:Bbb23 16:10, 6 February 2017 that block me for sock puppetry.However,I've been trying to send massage but I couldn't sent a message on his talk page because of this auto block.

I Appeal for unblock-autoOlusola David, Ayibiowu (talk) 11:01, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

I Appeal for unblock-auto because its now over six month since last edited as a result of auto-block and there is substantial content/references to back what I'm writing.(Olusola David, Ayibiowu 00:04, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

• Request for unblock-auto.Olusola David, Ayibiowu

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Olusola David, Ayibiowu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Dear Administrator,the block is no longer necessary because I understood what I am blocked for, I will not do it again, and I will make productive contributions instead; I Appeal for unblock-auto because the Standard Offer for Six months that was made available to me its over and its been over six month since last edited as a result of auto-block and there is substantial content/references to back up or support what I'm writing about.Olusola David, Ayibiowu 17:57, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

It has been six months, but it's not clear whether or not you plan to continue writing about Olusola David, Ayibiowu. I'm uncomfortable lifting this block unless you unambiguously state that you'll refrain from writing on that topic area, broadly construed. Yamla (talk) 21:23, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• Request for unblock-auto.Olusola David, Ayibiowu

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Olusola David, Ayibiowu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Dear Administrator,I will refrain from writing on that topic area Olusola David, Ayibiowu from now because I want to make contribution to the on going competition starts on 1st October 2017 and closes on 30th November 2017.Wiki loves Africa 2017 before it end

Accept reason:

I have unblocked you on that basis. Yamla (talk) 11:35, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Olusola David, Ayibiowu 09:44, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

@Bbb23: You are the blocking administrator. I'd like to consider unblocking this user. Do you have any objections? --Yamla (talk) 11:55, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

• Request for unblock-auto.Olusola David, Ayibiowu

{unblock|1=Dear Administrator,Reminder today is the last day I want to make contribution to the on going competition because is closing today on 30th November 2017.Wiki Loves Africa 2017 and also to make contributions to others Wikipedia articles.}Olusola David, Ayibiowu 07:26, 30 November 2017 (UTC)