February 2021 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Lump of labour fallacy have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:53, 20 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 19:31, 27 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Tagetes. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. — UncleBubba T @ C ) 21:17, 27 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

March 2021 edit

  Hello, I'm Llacb47. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Powerade, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please do not add unsourced and irrelevant material, like you did in this revision. Llacb47 (talk) 04:04, 14 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:List of climatosecptic parties has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:List of climatosecptic parties. Thanks! Greenman (talk) 19:57, 28 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of climatosecptic parties (June 30) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 20:28, 30 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, OjuzKiopo! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 20:28, 30 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:List of climatosecptic parties edit

  Hello, OjuzKiopo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of climatosecptic parties, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 30 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:List of climatosecptic parties edit

 

Hello, OjuzKiopo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of climatosecptic parties".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:56, 30 December 2021 (UTC)Reply