Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 15) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Utopes was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Utopes (talk / cont) 04:16, 15 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Ogset! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Utopes (talk / cont) 04:16, 15 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Xylanase (March 28) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MicrobiologyMarcus was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
microbiologyMarcus [petri dish·growths] 02:02, 28 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Edits to Aminopeptidase article edit

It looks like you wrote a decent bit of the current Aminopeptidase article, including the Mechanism section. The mechanism section is good, but it doesn't currently have a source, and it seems unlikely that people will be able to find one for it specifically given how specific it is. If you have a source for it, would you mind adding it? Otherwise I'm probably going to delete it (really specific paragraphs like this are hard to find sources for unless the original source can be found). Mrfoogles (talk) 05:40, 7 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

okay noted i will add the source Ogset (talk) 03:20, 9 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

April 2024 edit

  Hello, I'm Tedder. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Glass microsphere have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. tedder (talk) 15:43, 17 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Molybdenum dioxide. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. tedder (talk) 16:33, 18 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did at Magnesium aspartate, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. tedder (talk) 07:28, 19 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Blocked for sockpuppetry edit

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ogset. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Girth Summit (blether) 16:21, 1 May 2024 (UTC)Reply