Oct13

Ways to improve Predestination in Catholicism

Hello, Oct13,

Thank you for creating Predestination in Catholicism.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Citing the Catechism does not give notability to this teaching. What is needed are references from significant coverage about the topic of the article, and independent of it, in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS; that is your guide. You may also read WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources. A more comprehensive guide is WP:SOURCES ... Providing sufficient references, ideally one per fact referred to, that meet these tough criteria is likely to allow this article to remain. Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the topic is not suitable for inclusion. Kindly do the needful. Thank you.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 03:54, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

"Assent of faith" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Assent of faith and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 13#Assent of faith until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 21:10, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

"Full assent of faith" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Full assent of faith and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 13#Full assent of faith until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 21:10, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 19

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Criticism of the Quran

added a link pointing to Shirk

Jahannam

added a link pointing to Shirk

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Criticism of the Quran, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shirk.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Autobiography of Anthony Mary Claret for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Autobiography of Anthony Mary Claret is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Autobiography of Anthony Mary Claret until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Pbritti (talk) 15:17, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

August 2022

Hello, I'm Iskandar323. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Criticism of Muhammad, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Suffice to say, religious websites should not be your go-to for reliable information. Primary religious texts can also not be used as standalone sources - they need to be backed by secondary analysis. Iskandar323 (talk) 08:10, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Mortal Sins According To The Catholic Church

Template:Mortal Sins According To The Catholic Church has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Elizium23 (talk) 09:19, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Abomination (Judaism) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abomination (Judaism) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abomination (Judaism) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Pbritti (talk) 23:29, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

November 2022

Hello, I'm Tgeorgescu. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Queen of Heaven, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. tgeorgescu (talk) 21:09, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Catholic hamartiology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eighth Commandment.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Original holiness moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Original holiness, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:40, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

Fallacies of atheism moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Fallacies of atheism, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:05, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Completed revelation for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Completed revelation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Completed revelation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Veverve (talk) 14:46, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infallible declarations

Template:Infallible declarations has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Veverve (talk) 23:19, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Religious responses to the problem of evil, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eternal life.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:46, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Original holiness

Hello, Oct13. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Original holiness, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:03, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Fallacies of atheism

Hello, Oct13. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Fallacies of atheism, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Fallacies of atheism

Hello, Oct13. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Fallacies of atheism".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:13, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Persecution of Christians by Christians for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Persecution of Christians by Christians is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Persecution of Christians by Christians until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Tomorrow and tomorrow (talk) 01:10, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)