OMGShay 92

Welcome!

Hi OMGShay 92! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! I dream of horses (Contribs) Please notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you. 21:51, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

Links to user pages and sandboxes

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to user pages or sandboxes, as you did at Ebanks. Since these pages have not been accepted as articles, user pages, sandboxes and drafts are not suitable for linking in articles. and such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 09:03, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Reply: I'm sorry, but my aunt wanted me to add myself as I did on Ebanks. Thank you - OMGShay 92 14:40, 4 October 2020 (GMT)

Neville (fictional character) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Neville (fictional character), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 15:38, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Neville (fictional character) (October 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Neville (fictional character) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Neville (fictional character), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 16:34, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello, OMGShay 92! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 16:34, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Email reply

Hi, the key thing when writing a new article is that all new articles on Wikipedia have to show the subject is notable (See WP:N) which in most cases requires significant coverage in multiple independent (WP:INDY) reliable sources (WP:RS). I don't know if Draft:Neville (fictional character) is an important character (I'm assuming in Thomas & Friends) - but since on List of Thomas & Friends characters the characters don't appear to have individual articles I would guess not. If you think they are notable you need to find sources to show that they are. You can ask for more advice from lots of experienced editors at the Wikipedia:Teahouse. If your a fan of subjects like this that may not be encyclopedic enough for articles on Wikipedia then you may find fandom.com more suitable. All the best KylieTastic (talk) 17:18, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Neville (fictional character) (October 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheAafi was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Neville (fictional character) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Neville (fictional character), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

─ The Aafī (^talk) 14:42, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Neville (fictional character) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Neville (fictional character), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ─ The Aafī (^talk) 15:35, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Neville (fictional character) (October 19)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Bilorv was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

— Bilorv (talk) 21:48, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Ask me a question! 👋

Ask me anything, as long as it complies with the rules below:

1. No dating. I will not allow it when you send me something. 2. Do not attempt to spam the discussion wall with the same message by you. 3. Don't discriminate me by my religion, ethnicity, race or gender identity. 4. Do not upload adult content. It will be taken off, plus you will be blocked if you do this. 5. Do not ask me if I am gay or bisexual. 6. Botting is allowed, but do not program your robots to send spam links. 7. No death threats. An example would be, "I will kill you". 8. Do not use random letters in one word, IN ONE SENTENCE! An example is, "wjsyejejevkswkkdje" OMGShay 92 (talk) 21:12, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Neville (fictional character)

Hello, OMGShay 92. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Neville (fictional character), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Neville (fictional character)

Hello, OMGShay 92. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Neville".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:33, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

UK flag protocols

Btw, read this before you accuse people of changing the UK flag. It explicitly says normal proporations of the UK flag on land is 3:5. The 1:2 is also a correct ratio but they are customarily made. https://www.flaginstitute.org/wp/uk-flags/british-flag-protocol/#index3 Conor M98 (talk) 16:27, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

The UK’s flag shape of 3:5 works well with nearly all other nations’ flags and it is recommended to use these proportions if a standard size is required for all the flags in a display. However this wasn't the case on Wikipedia and the 1:2 ratio should be used instead due to the flags' shapes. OMGShay 92 (talk) 16:43, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

WiciBrosiect Cymru

Ymunwch gyda WiciBrosiect Cymru os gwelwch yn dda! Diolch Titus Gold (talk) 21:30, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of GTSQ

The page GTSQ has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review. Primefac (talk) 08:44, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)