March 2024 edit

  Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! CpX41 (talk) 14:06, 11 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Bank of Jerusalem edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Bank of Jerusalem, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:25, 14 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for March 14 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Beer in Israel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:04, 14 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Bank of Israel edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Bank of Israel, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:53, 19 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started edit

Hi O.maximov. Thank you for your work on Malka Beer. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 14:28, 6 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

May 2024 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Template:Economics and Business books, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 22:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Contentious topics alert for all pages related to post-1992 American politics edit

Introduction to contentious topics edit

You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Doug Weller talk 10:36, 18 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

More alerts - Arab-Israeli conlict and Balkans/Eastern Europe edit

  You have recently made edits related to the Arab–Israeli conflict. This is a standard message to inform you that the Arab–Israeli conflict is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. Additionally, editors must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert on the same page within 24 hours for pages within this topic. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics.

  You have recently made edits related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe. This is a standard message to inform you that the Balkans or Eastern Europe is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Doug Weller talk 10:42, 18 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Please respond here so I know you have read the above edit

I see you haven't responded on this page yet. Doug Weller talk 10:49, 18 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Doug Weller, I have read those, thank you very much for all the info. I'll make sure I follow the guidelines. O.maximov (talk) 16:53, 18 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for responding. Doug Weller talk 17:23, 18 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for bringing this to my attention. It's good to know that there are policies in place when it comes to sensitive subjects... I bet this is a great challenge to ensure civility and neutrality around here. Again, happy to be here, and you can certainly trust me to uphold the rules. O.maximov (talk) 17:36, 18 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

WP:1RR at 2024 pro-Palestinian protests on university campuses edit

Hi; at topics related to the Israel-Arab conflict, editors are restricted to one revert every 24 hours: An editor must not perform more than one reverts on a single page—whether involving the same or different material—within a 24-hour period. An edit or a series of consecutive edits that undoes or manually reverses other editors' actions—whether in whole or in part—counts as a revert.

In the past 24 hours you have made several reverts:

  1. 11:00, 19 May 2024
  2. 11:01, 19 May 2024
  3. 11:10, 19 May 2024
  4. 11:18, 19 May 2024
  5. 11:53, 19 May 2024

Please self-revert all but your first revert. 03:26, 27 April 2024. Unbandito (talk) 13:35, 19 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello @Unbandito, I don't think this is a revert, but one series of consecutive edits that alter the article. If it counts as a revert (and I'm doubtful it does), it probably counts as one. A revert means you cancel, or reverse, the edit of someone else, which I did not do. O.maximov (talk) 14:01, 19 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
I understand your confusion, I am still learning the intricacies of the 1RR myself. However, these are reverts. The edits contain strikethroughs, which means you are wholly or partially undoing the work of another editor, and these strikethroughs are not mere grammatical or copyediting changes, but changes that impact the meaning of the article. Therefore, they are reverts. Please self-revert these edits. Unbandito (talk) 14:07, 19 May 2024 (UTC)Reply