User talk:Nz101/Archive 4
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
20:01:41, 21 September 2015 review of submission by Rebeccaartsarmy
Hello! I am writing seeking more clarity about why my submission has been declined. The article was initially rejected because it was said to read like an advertisement, so I rewrote it to make it as objective as possible and merely a source of facts, details and history about an organization.
I initially had included many more references and quotes from a variety of media sources, but I removed several of them because they praised the subject in question, and I didn't want to have anything subjective remaining.
Could you please point out exactly which passages / details are still objectionable so that I may fix them? Or is the problem that I now do not have a wide enough range of sources because I've removed so many?
Thank you very much.
05:31:49, 27 September 2015 review of submission by Eyalnirr
The draft article titled "Eyal Nir" has been submitted and rejected a few times by now.
The explanation provided has to do the Reference section stating it should be improved.
Mr. Nir serves as Vice President of the World Traditional Karate Federation and chairman of the Israeli branch as such he is a well known international figure and is involved \ leads many international initiatives.
The references provided clearly show the above in a verifiable way so I am not sure what to do at this point, how to improve the referencing and appreciate your help and guidance.
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)