User talk:Nz101/Archive 3

Speedy Deletion Nomination

Hello, Nz101. You have new messages at Hamarek01's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Dear Sir/Madam, I believe that you're mistaken on your assumption of violations within the information I have provided. Would you please be a bit more specific or remove your comments. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ynotngl (talk • contribs) 19:29, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Khayal Abbas AkhTar

Sir, this person being a controversial personality in his country. His article has been attacked (several times) with vandalism in past. You, being an experienced wikipedian, suggest either to remove it from wikipedia (to avoid expected vandalism in future) or anything else? contact me — Preceding unsigned comment added by Imabbas (talk • contribs) 08:47, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Re: Khayal Abbas AkhTar

sorry for removing tag...plz tell me what should i do next — Preceding unsigned comment added by Imabbas (talk • contribs) 09:33, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Editing my sorority info

Editing my sorority page. I am a member of Alpha Gamma Xi and the info you have tagged for deletion is from OUR page. Napptural (talk) 09:01, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

The content on the article is mostly copied from the website of the organisation. This isn't allowed on wikipedia unfortunately. However, I would encourage you to rewrite the article, referencing the information on the website of the organisation as well as other sources. See WP:COPYVIO and WP:COPYPASTE for clarification on this, as well as WP:CITE for information on citations and references. You may also find WP:STYLE helpful for rewriting your article. Nz101^Userpage_Talkpage 09:07, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Re:AGXI PAGE

That information was not copy and pasted. If you had knowledge of Sorority rules and regulation you would know that only certain information Is privy to the public. The information I posted Is not only in our Sorority press kits, but each Soror has the same information printed in our materials, on our public Facebook page, and other public forums. As you stated it is MOSTLY similar to the website. And that is because this is the only information privy to the public. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Napptural (talk • contribs) 09:21, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Re:AGXI PAGE

Copies that are not copyright violations. If content appears both here and somewhere else (possibly in modified form), consider the possibility that Wikipedia's is the original version and the other site copied from us. Alternatively, the same author may have written both versions, or the original may be free content.'Bold text'

As both historian and PR for AGXI I think i have the right to post my info about my organization, as being I am responsible for overseeing both the website and this page, I am within my rights according to the parameters of the above paragraph. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Napptural (talk • contribs) 09:38, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Re:AGXI PAGE

1. There is no conflict if interest. I an providing factual and biographical information about an organization. This information is to inform and provide readers with current information of AGXi.the same way you have a "job" as an administrator, my job is sorority public affairs and history.

2. There is no compensation involved. We gain nothing from our Volunteer efforts. We only strive to aide women veterans.

3. The other military sorority page for Kappa Epsilon Psi is in the EXACT same format. I know because I contributed to it as well as a former member.

It seems that either you have no idea of hour sorority business is handled or you are now reaching at any excuse to delete my post, as now you've given me another, yet non applicable reason.

This is really more of a headache than needed. Delete the bloody page.I feel for a person that takes Wikipedia editing this seriously. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Napptural (talk • contribs) 10:06, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

I completely understand everything you're saying. You mentioned in your previous message on my talk page that you are a member of the society, which constitutes a COI Nz101^Userpage_Talkpage 10:26, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Re Kappa Epsilon Psi Military Sorority, Inc., that article is acceptable because it follows correct style guidelines, is not a direct copy paste of a website and has references. I would invite you to rewrite your article based on that page as I think that would make an excellent article. You can draft this in your userspace by creating a sandbox, which for you would be User:Napptural/Sandbox. All the guidelines are here to ensure a consistent experience for readers, avoid bias, and avoid any legal or copyright issues. Please don't take this as an attack of any description on you, it is absolutely not. I was reviewing the page you created when it came up on the new pages feed, and took action based on what I saw. I'm trying to assist you to rectify the issues that exist in your article Nz101^Userpage_Talkpage 10:32, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Regarding Conflict of Interest: Global Mobility Solutions page

I have reviewed your note! I have reviewed the guidelines for conflict of interest and can confirm that no such conflict exists. Also if you have recommendations on how language should be changed to have a more neutral POV, please inform. Globalrelocation (talk) 22:45, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Top Marques Monaco

Hi, and thanks for your attention to Top Marques Monaco. I saw that a previous version of the page had been deleted for advertising, so I'm trying to be careful to source everything I'm putting in. Any advice you may have is welcome! —GrammarFascist _contribs^talk 23:58, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

You addition at WP:AFC

Thank you for volunteering to help, but I had to remove name as you currently do not meet the criteria as stated at the top of the page Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Participants. Please feel free to come back and help when you meet the criteria.- McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 12:52, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Eunisell Nigeria

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (the reason for deletion being that Eunisell Nigeria is not important enough, I disagree with the reason. Eunisell is an important organisation in Nigeria, Africa in the petro chemical specialty fluid sector, it has lived to standard since its inception and its an official sponsor of one of Nigeria biggest football club Sharks FC, having attained this I believe they are due the page, without breaking any of Wikipedia rules. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bode056 (talk • contribs) 13:46, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Removing talk page comments

Do you realize that your edit removed the talk page comments? – czar 14:28, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

17:22:29, 18 September 2015 review of submission by 86.171.202.103

• 86.171.202.103 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Welsh Distant Relations (Royal Family) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Could you help me with referencing? 86.171.202.103 (talk) 17:22, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

are you crazy?

are you out of your mind? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.180.24.27 (talk) 06:02, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Apologies, I thought your edit was vandalism. Childrens show names can often sound ridiculous, which is why your vandalism reversion looked like vandalism to me. Please consider how you approach people who make mistakes next time however, "are you out of your mind" is not the way to do it. Nz101^Userpage_Talkpage 06:19, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

untitled

Why? You insert a tag on my page . Remove it or otherwise i will do a case on you guranteed in 5 hours Kushagraasati.1 (talk) 06:08, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

AFC reviewing

I notice that you have declined the draft, Draft:Facial Nerve Decompression, on the grounds that it does not use ref tags (which are strictly optional). I notice also that Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Reviewing instructions says "Avoid declining an article because it correctly uses general references to support some or all of the material" and "The use of <ref> tags, although popular, is not required". AFC is not GA. I request that you read the reviewing instructions and then have a second look at the article. WhatamIdoing (talk) 15:41, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

@WhatamIdoing: I may not have been clear enough, apologies. I was simply referring to the messy references section at the bottom of the article. Nz101^Userpage_Talkpage 01:58, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Then you should have accepted it. Formatting is not a requirement for reviewing AFCs. That's #4 in the list of mistakes that reviewers need to avoid: "Avoid declining an article because it contains formatting issues".

It may help if you think about AFCs from a completely opposite perspective: The core task for AFC reviews is to try to predict which articles will die at AFD (and decline those) and which would survive (and accept those). Citation formatting is not a reason to delete an article about a notable subject, and therefore it is not a reason to decline an AFC draft. By contrast, citation formatting on a long-ish article like this can be a good reason to add a template like {{no footnotes}} to the top of the article, so you could add that template when you accept it. WhatamIdoing (talk) 12:14, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

06:12:25, 20 September 2015 review of submission by Thenewsmakers

• Thenewsmakers (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:BrandMoxie (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Good morning,

I would like to know why you've said the company is not notable enough. I thought I included many references...maybe I didn't do it properly. Would you please help me fix it.

Thanks you