Nscharan007
Your submission at Articles for creation: DPS Azaad Nagar (September 24) edit
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/DPS Azaad Nagar.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
Welcome! edit
Hello, Nscharan007, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Tea House, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Starting an article
- Your first article
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! AnupMehra ✈ 00:54, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
Your submission at AfC DPS Azaad Nagar was accepted edit
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
AnupMehra ✈ 12:18, 24 September 2013 (UTC)We do not use certain terms edit
As an encyclopedia that presents content from a neutral point of view, there are certain terms that we do not use. "freedom fighter" is one of them. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 21:40, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
then atleast produce a working link for that
- I have. But if you cannot read the whole page, WP:LABEL -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 21:52, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
then we should remove both.....he is crime lawyer.....so we should remove both militant and freedom fighter
- no, " militant" is an objective not value laden description of his activities which is well sourced. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 22:00, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
Your recent edits edit
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (
or 
) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Please stop edit warring edit
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 21:54, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
Adding a page about Mass bunk in engineering college edit
Just wanted to create a page about mass bunk in engineering colleges, and how they are organised b a full batch of students to avoid the boring lectures and over-boring labs
Speedy deletion nomination of Mass Bunk edit
Hello Nscharan007,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Mass Bunk for deletion, because it doesn't seem to have any encyclopedic content.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Fiachra10003 (talk) 13:26, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
Gopalgarh Riots edit
Write an article about gopalgarh riots happened in September 2011
Veer edit
I've reverted your addition of this title. Several reasons. One, it's unsourced. Secondly, most of our English readers won't know what it means. And third, we rarely use titles, certainly not as part of someone's name in the lead. The same way we don't add 'Dr.' to people's names. Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 08:41, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
Wikipedia and copyright edit
Hello Nscharan007, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.
- You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
- Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
- Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
- If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
- Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied without attribution. If you want to copy from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 09:00, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
- I've deleted your sandbox and removed your edit to 2000 Amarnath pilgrimage massacre because they were copyright violations. Dougweller (talk) 09:01, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
Please note that this nomination is invalid as there is no user named "NSCHARAN007 (talk · contribs)" (in capitals). If you were planning to nominate yourself at WP:RFA, I would strongly advise against it – you've made only 50 edits and any nomination would be guaranteed to fail. Please have a read of Wikipedia:Advice for RfA candidates. Thanks, SuperMarioMan ( talk ) 23:11, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
- I was going to suggest the same things. First: usernames are case sensitive - your username is Nscharan007 and not NSCHARAN007. As such, the RFA page you created is invalid. Second, it takes thousands of edits to become an admin; yes, thousands. Third, self-nom's rarely succeed - when a respected admin approaches you and says "ever think of becoming an admin?" then it's a good chance to say "ok". the panda ɛˢˡ” 10:59, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
February 2015 edit
Hello, I'm Apparition11. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Tourism in Uttarakhand because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Apparition11 Complaints/Mistakes 17:56, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
WittyFeed edit
Hi, I received your email, which I reproduce here so that other editors also can follow the conversation. My answer is below. --Randykitty (talk) 10:14, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
Hi,
You just deleted the page "Wittyfeed". I want to contest that deletion. Here's the reason why you shouldn't have deleted this page.
1. Wittyfeed is famous internet media company with 80 million monthly user.
https://www.similarweb.com/website/wittyfeed.com
2. Wikipedia already have pages for other internet media companies like Buzzfeed and Diply. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BuzzFeed https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diply
3. Vatsana Technologies (parent company of Wittyfeed) is well established startup recognized in the corporate world.
4. If the page of Wittyfeed sounds like self promotion then please remove the specific parts which doesn't follow the regulations of Wikipedia.
Thanks for reading.
Regards Narender Charan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nscharan007 (talk • contribs)
- Yes, WP has articles on other Internet companies. But compare what you wrote with the article on BuzzFeed. That article is written in a neutral and encyclopedic way. In contrast, what you wrote is heavily promotional. I have had another look at the article and cannot but come to the same conclusion: this is irredeemably promotional, so much so that I will not undelete and userfy it. If you think that you can show that this company is notable, you could start over at Draft:WittyFeed. However, I checked most of the references that you added to the article and a lot of them were simply dead links or sources that are not independent of the subject. To show that this company meets our inclusion criteria (see also WP:NORG), you will need reliable sources that are independent of the company and provide an in-depth discussion (so press releases and short in-passing mentions are not enough). Hope this helps. --Randykitty (talk) 10:14, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:WittyFeed, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 17:22, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Nscharan007 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Please provide the suitable reason for blocking my account
Decline reason:
Your current block reason seems perfectly suitable. I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Max Semenik (talk) 06:54, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Nscharan007 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I understand the concern for which I have been blocked for. Therefore, I claim that I will not continue to cause damage or disruption to Wikipedia, and will make useful contributions instead.
Decline reason:
This doesn't address the reason for your block at all. You need to convince us. Yamla (talk) 18:12, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Nscharan007 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I do understand that I was blocked for using multiple accounts for the creation and editing of Wittyfeed page. Though I do confess that I did some edits to push the unsourced facts about Wittyfeed, but I haven't made any multiple accounts. I have only one account i.e., this one. That's why I'm requesting you to unblock it
Decline reason:
Checkuser evidence confirms that you have been using multiple accounts, so I'm going to straight-up call that out as a lie. Since you cannot be honest in your unblock requests, we are wasting our time dealing with you; talkpage access has now been revoked. Yunshui 雲水 09:26, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.