Noluogo

• Wikipedia the best

ciaooo

Removing useful site

Why are you so dead-set on removing Venezia.Net from the list of useful resources in Venice? Assuming you've read my comments elsewhere, you'll have noticed by now that (a) I have no connection with that site; and (b) my "credentials" in removing link spam are far better than yours (see my contributions) — I'm beginning to suspect you of being a competitor of Venezia.Net's.! There is nothing the matter at all with commercial sites, which Wikipedia articles link to all the time. Maybe you need a bit more experience with Wikipedia, not just one article, attacked over and over again.... Bill 18:37, 27 October 2005 (UTC)

This is very likely all the same user, whose only "contribution" to Wikipedia had been, until a coupla days ago, repeatedly to remove external links to VeniceGuide and Venezia.Net in the article Venice:

• User:81.211.239.70
• User:81.211.240.45
• User:81.211.240.231
• User:81.211.241.3
• User:81.211.241.68
• User:81.211.241.99
• User:81.211.241.235
• User:81.211.242.8
• User:81.211.251.68
• User:81.211.251.78
• User:81.211.251.247
• User:81.211.252.63
• User:81.211.252.84
• User:81.211.252.85
• User:81.211.252.219
• User:81.211.253.11
• User:81.211.253.170
• User:81.211.253.175
• User:81.211.253.251
• User:81.211.254.224

The range 81.211.192.0 - 81.211.255.255 is all on the same Tele2/SWIPNET dialup server. User Noluogo should be considered a multiple-uses vandal. Hides behind anonymity, refuses to answer queries, and is in all probability a competing Venice site. The very latest repeated contributions consist of removing VeniceGuide and Venezia.Net — but adding a list of other links, some good, some much worse crap than those two. Bill 23:57, 10 November 2005 (UTC)