Nischaynamdev

Welcome!

Hello, Nischaynamdev, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Dayanand Bhartiya Public Senior Secondary School, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! — Ascii002 ^{Let's talk!} 05:48, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dayanand Bhartiya Public Senior Secondary School

The article Dayanand Bhartiya Public Senior Secondary School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:GNG; no references

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Ascii002 ^{Let's talk!} 05:48, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Federico Revello

Hello Nischaynamdev,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Federico Revello for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. --Richard Yin (talk) 18:55, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

April 2017

Your addition to Hindu Kush has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. GorillaWarfare (talk) 19:35, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Ms Sarah Welch. I noticed that you recently removed content from Hindu Kush without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.

Please do not disrupt wikipedia articles by deleting sources and sourced content, nor insert phrases such as "so-called Islamic scholars" as to did in Hindu Kush article. Your cooperation is requested, Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 19:37, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive edits of Hindu Kush. Deletion of large quantities of sourced information and insertion of point of view without consensus. Please discuss on the article's talk page and obtain consensus before making such edits. Apuldram (talk) 20:47, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Hindu Kush shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 20:42, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

July 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Azad Kashmir, you may be blocked from editing. Kautilya3 (talk) 18:20, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

April 2018

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Azad Kashmir, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. —TripWire^{________ʞlɐʇ} 10:10, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to User:TripWire. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:21, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Dayanand Bhartiya Public Senior Secondary School for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dayanand Bhartiya Public Senior Secondary School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dayanand Bhartiya Public Senior Secondary School until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:03, 20 April 2022 (UTC)