Dear Nikospag, I'm Wolfgangius. I'm contacting you about the revision 947182074 I did on the template: 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic data/Greece medical cases chart. You have undone my revision and left the comment: "Not meaningful edit". Could you please be a little bit more specific about the non-meaningfulness of the proposed revision? I don't mind you have undone my revision, but I would like to know why is not meaningful. Maybe I'm missing something. I see that most of the similar templates in other countries' wikipedia pages have information about the number of deaths. Many thanks.
- These other countries they have also calculated the percentage increase for each day. You used absolute increase for each day. Its not meaningful to have two columns with different increase types. Please look more carefully at similar templates in other countries. Eg 2020 coronavirus pandemic in Europe
Thank you. --Nikospag (talk) 15:00, 25 March 2020 (UTC) - Dear Nikospag, I see your point. I followed the South Korean template, where also only the absolute increase per day is shown. I can add also the percentages like the templates of UK, Germany, France, and Iran that have both absolute and percentage increase. Thanks. Wolfgangius (talk) 19:58, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- The absolute increase per day is not needed, is too much. Besides that, the absolute increase per day is shown in the main table of the page. Also the template would become too wide, you saw the templates of UK, Germany, France, and Iran. --Nikospag (talk) 21:27, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- I'll add only the percentages then.Wolfgangius (talk) 11:13, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- The absolute increase per day is not needed, is too much. Besides that, the absolute increase per day is shown in the main table of the page. Also the template would become too wide, you saw the templates of UK, Germany, France, and Iran. --Nikospag (talk) 21:27, 25 March 2020 (UTC)