Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 14)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 19:17, 14 January 2016 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Nicole2793, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 19:17, 14 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

edit

Hello, Nicole2793, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Additional Resources
  • You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:17, 21 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Bohol

edit

Hi Nicole2793. I made a few changes to your Bohol#Tarsier section. The first thing I did was to move the section about the Philippine Tarsier Foundation up to the top of that section. Without it, a reader might not be sure what all of a sudden they're reading about tarsiers in an article about Bohol. It's usually helpful to start with a statement that explains why that section is there first. One problem with that paragraph is that is doesn't have a supporting source. While it may be supported by one of the citations in the other paragraph you added, this won't be clear to the reader. And since this is Wikipedia, people will edit your contributions (like I just did); for that reason, supporting citations should, at minimum, be included once a paragraph.

One other thing - you should always try to make use of other articles. Wikipedia has an article on the Philippine tarsier - if you link to it, then you don't need to spend so much time explaining what it is. An interested reader can always click through the link to learn more. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:22, 29 January 2016 (UTC)Reply