Welcome! edit

Hello, NewageEd, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Steel1943 (talk) 14:18, 3 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived edit

 

Hi NewageEd! You created a thread called Living kidnap victims named and illustrated at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 22 September 2019 (UTC)Reply



== Closing resource request for Johnson 2008 about focus stacking ==

In the absence of a response from you, I'm marking your resource request {{resolved}}. It should be archived shortly to Wikipedia:WikiProject Resource Exchange/Resource Request/Archive 81#How the term "focus stacking" is used/defined in two cited references. I've added to the citation of Johnson on Focus stacking a quote where he defines the technique, from a section he titles "Stacked Focus". I've also left a note on the article's talk page, where the source was questioned. I'll keep scans of the section on my desktop for a little while in case you return to editing soon and want to see them, but won't keep them indefinitely. --Worldbruce (talk) 17:48, 17 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Worldbruce (talk) - Thank you for adding the quote from Dave Johnson to the Focus stacking reference number 2. That addition, in conjunction with knowing that the section is called "Stacked Focus" should be all I need. Please email it to me if it is still available, if not, I'm too slow; and I do appreciate all you have done.