Neodante

Global prescience

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Global prescience, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Global Prescience. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:57, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

August 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Global Prescience, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Global Prescience was changed by Neodante (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-08-28T20:02:42+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 20:02, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Global Prescience constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. ClosedEyesSeeing (talk) 20:04, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Global Prescience. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. ClosedEyesSeeing (talk) 20:05, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Quit before you invest more energy?

I haven't investigated why the above editors have ascribed your changes to vandalism...but...I have some advice. You aren't going to win this one. The article has quite a number of problems that will attract the attention of other editors. You could spend a lot of time and mental energy...but...honestly...you should just let the topic speak for itself. 67.169.127.176 (talk) 06:33, 29 August 2008 (UTC)