This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NecrozmaSpin (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I'm not a sock or a troll, I am a legitimate user. I just want to help! Please unblock me, I just wanted to help the site. I just joined and I was helping out with duck investigations and and giving suggestions on how to deal with them. I have no bad intentions and I want to make the wiki a better place. I understand why you believe I'm a duck. Unblock me, and I'll prove to you that I'm no sock, but just an average user.
My evidence:
1. I was helping out other users with sock investigations.
2. I have no reason to be a sockmaster. I want to help the site, not harm it!
3. I set up my profile page. If I were a sock, why would I even bother?
4. I did not vandalize any pages.
5. My username is from a Pokemon, not the word "necrophilia". I don't even know why that is a thing!
6. I see that my IP address is in a range blocked because of a scummy sockmaster. But I do not have any connection to him. Also, I believe he has been inactive for a while.

When I am unblocked, I will:
1. Lengthen stubs
2. Fix typos and grammatical errors


I promise I will not break the rules. I will follow the guidelines and will become a better user.

Toodles, NecrozmaSpin Wanna discuss things?

Decline reason:

You say that you have just joined; your level of knowledge of Wikipedia procedures indicates that this is clearly not the case. Please indicate under which guise you have previously edited here. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 11:07, 18 February 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

NecrozmaSpin (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #20652 was submitted on Feb 17, 2018 22:58:16. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 22:58, 17 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Edit; Yes, I'm a sock. I have had other, older accounts that I can't remember the names of, but I forgot the passwords for them. So, I made this account. Sorry for the trouble I may have caused. I wanted to help, but I may have accidentally made a disruption. Please forgive me, I am a good-faith editor and I'm here to build an encyclopedia. Also, I remember one had "datboi" in the name. Can't remember the entire name though.

It would have been more believable if you had said this earlier, rather than posting a denial of socking. I have trouble believing that you can completely forget both the usernames and passwords of, from your comment, at least two previous accounts. Or was it more?--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 17:14, 18 February 2018 (UTC)Reply


It's been a long time since I used them. I just want to start on a clean slate. NecrozmaSpin (talk) 14:21, 19 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NecrozmaSpin (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

The only alt I am able to access is Mito. However, I've had an alt with "datboi" in the name. Can't remember the full name, though. I'm sorry. NecrozmaSpin (talk) 13:51, 3 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Not one of your edits has been remotely constructive, and most of it seems to have been just playing around. What is more, assuming that by "alt" you mean another account you have used, then 13 years ago you were editing in ways which may have been done by a child, but not a very young child, so you must by now be an adult. If the sort of trolling you did had been done by a child it might be reasonable to think he or she could put it aside and grow out of it, but anyone who still finds such childishness an amusing way to spend their time when they have already grown up is not likely to grow out of it. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:23, 3 April 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm not that old. It was at least 2 years ago. And I'm sorry for my childish behavior. I just wanted to cheer people up. I may have not understood the ramifications. I apoligize.
I would be willing to consider unblocking you if you could convince me (a) that you really understand what was considered unacceptable about the editing you have done in the past, and (b) that you are being totally honest about your editing history. You say that you were "helping out other users with sock investigations", but can you see why others might regard what you did as unhelpful? If so, can you say why, so that we can know that you understand? When you wrote "The only alt I am able to access is Mito" did you mean that the account Mito is an earlier account of yours? If not, what did you mean? That account was created in April 2005, and started editing in July 2005. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 19:38, 4 April 2018 (UTC)Reply