Thank you very much for your kind help, I'll wait the new page or the changes at original page link's. I'm a doctor not politician. I just would like to keep my Cv for my patients and colleagues and do not be confuse. Victor


Ok, Mr Michael, could you change the original article as Victor Felix Reviglio to avoid confuse information. I'm sure you do not like to find another Michael Devore at the Web.

Nationsguard.

There are a number of people named Michael Devore on the web, the name isn't very unique; some even share my middle initial. Anyway, if the new article Víctor E Reviglio stays for a while without being challenged on notability and removed, I will see about creating a disambiguation page at Víctor Reviglio which links to both articles on Víctor Félix Reviglio and Víctor Eduardo Reviglio so anyone can easily find either. In the meantime, as a compromise, I put an "other uses" note on the Víctor Reviglio page which directs to Víctor E Reviglio so the name will be associated with the article you wish it to be. -- Michael Devore (talk) 08:06, 7 October 2008 (UTC)Reply


you are wrong, the correct information is the last add to Victor Reviglio and Victor E. Reviglio, do not be confused.

How are we confused? The original article at Víctor Reviglio was about Víctor Félix Reviglio born in 1938, a governor of province of Santa Fe, Argentina, along with a reference sourcing the information. You have overwritten that content with information about a different individual, one who now has his own article (in need of cleanup) at Víctor E Reviglio which, if it survives should probably be retitled Víctor E. Reviglio or Víctor Eduardo Reviglio.
It is not a mistake to state that you should not overwrite sourced articles on subjects with content on a new subject. The original article content at Víctor Reviglio will be restored soon. Please do not again overwrite the article without a explanation of why the doctor's information should overwrite the original article content. In the absence of this explanation, please consider the warnings you have blanked here on your talk page to be properly placed. -- Michael Devore (talk) 02:05, 6 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Víctor E Reviglio edit

 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Víctor E Reviglio, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. —KCinDC (talk) 05:23, 23 October 2008 (UTC)Reply