Napsjam

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Eliot (writer) (February 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John Eliot (writer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:John Eliot (writer), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 19:14, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Napsjam! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 19:14, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:John Eliot (1562–1594?) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:John Eliot (1562–1594?). Thanks! asilvering (talk) 00:40, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Eliot (1562–1594?) has been accepted

John Eliot (1562–1594?), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 00:47, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

John Eliot article

Hi, the comment I left on your draft earlier is basically what I have now added in the clean-up tag. If you could use footnotes in the article, that would help a lot with understanding what ideas come from what source. For example, is "When war could rightly be made, and how, was a current topic of great interest, and we should expect Shakespeare to have read more than one book on these themes." still coming from Shalvi? Thanks! -- asilvering (talk) 00:52, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

Hi - thanks so much for this. How do I further edit the text to clarify things as you suggest? - best - Ambrose Napsjam (talk) 12:36, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

Also, how should I indicate book titles - italics? Napsjam (talk) 12:38, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

Yes, italics. For the first, I suggest using footnotes, since putting a footnote at the end of a sentence or paragraph implies that whatever follows is not from that source. By the way, I see you've been writing footnotes manually, but there's an easier way, if you're using Visual Editor: use the "cite" button in the toolbar, then dump a DOI or ISBN into the "automatic" tab field. This works almost all of the time (but double-check the metadata). As a bonus, it also generates URLs that make it faster for readers to find the sources. -- asilvering (talk) 15:05, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

Many thanks. I have made changes. I have removed a bunch of stuff that is my own research - ie, i have no citation for it (this was the text after quoting Shalvi). I think this tightens things up. I have italicized titles. let me know if this looks right or i should do more. - thanks - Ambrose Napsjam (talk) 16:22, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

These statements in the "early life" section sourced to Ortho-epia Gallica - am I right in assuming that this is John Eliot saying so? It looks like we have outside evidence that he was at Oxford, but the rest is his own say-so?

The other thing to do would be to find places where this John Eliot ought to be mentioned, and wikilink back to this article. I tried a search but there are a lot of John Eliots out there, so I'll turn it back to you. -- asilvering (talk) 00:33, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

on the first point, yes, his say-so only. outside sources cited where known.

On the second, let me look and either "wikilink" or get back to you for help. Napsjam (talk) 13:05, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

Hi. I've tried to add as many links as i could. I only found one other mention in wikipedia of the ortho-epia - i have included that as a reference/citation. I have tried to clarify that the early life sources are just his own words. I hope this is looking better now. Kind regards, and thanks for your patience. Napsjam (talk) 13:28, 8 November 2023 (UTC)