Welcome!

edit
Hello, Nandinigoel.india and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking   if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! — Bill william comptonTalk 03:22, 24 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Proposed deletion of Horn of Africa in today's time

edit
 

The article Horn of Africa in today's time has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

topic covered in 2011 Horn of Africa famine

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Maethordaer (talk) 11:25, 12 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Education in true sense

edit
 

The article Education in true sense has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:Essay / WP:Soapbox / WP:OR

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Toddst1 (talk) 18:05, 13 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

August 2011

edit

  Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 18:06, 13 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Gurukul. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 18:07, 13 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

  This is your last warning. The next time you create an inappropriate page, as you did at Education in true sense, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Palltrast (talk) 18:30, 13 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Human is a Social Creature

edit
 

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Human is a Social Creature, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 04:14, 14 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Acroterion (talk) 04:29, 14 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Inappropriate essays

edit

Wikipedia isn't a free webhost for personal essays. Please restrict your contributions to appropriately encyclopedic topics, using references and sources and avoiding personal analysis. Acroterion (talk) 04:31, 14 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your contributed article, Consumer and its right

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Consumer and its right. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Consumer. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Consumer - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. VQuakr (talk) 04:27, 31 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Schoolbest

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Schoolbest, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. E Wing (talk) 04:27, 31 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

  This is your only warning; if you create an inappropriate page again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. VQuakr (talk) 04:28, 31 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

April 2014

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Girl has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Girl with this edit. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links may include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. --Slazenger (Contact Me) 04:22, 12 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Girl with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. --Slazenger (Contact Me) 04:23, 12 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Problems with upload of File:Educatemygirlgroup.png

edit

Thanks for uploading File:Educatemygirlgroup.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:06, 18 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

October 2014

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this recent edit to Educate My Girl, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Seahorseruler (Talk Page) (Contribs) 18:40, 18 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with this edit to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Educate My Girl. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Seahorseruler (Talk Page) (Contribs) 18:48, 18 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Alexf(talk) 00:36, 19 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nandinigoel.india (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Dear Mr. Alexf i am new to wiki please give me another chance. i will get familiar with wikipedia's rules for sure. Nandinigoel.india (talk) 03:33, 19 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

new to wiki -- You've been here for three years. i will get familiar with wikipedia's rules -- That's what you are supposed to do while you are blocked. Your next appeal must demonstrate that you are familiar with the relevant rules. MER-C 11:41, 19 October 2014 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


  You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nandinigoel.india. Thank you. Kinu t/c 15:31, 19 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Dear Mr. Kinu t/c. Please stop blaming me and my friends for sock puppetry. I am tired of all this. With my regards. I respect your decision. Regards

Wait, "my friends"? So you admit to canvassing them to !vote in support of this article? --Kinu t/c 16:07, 19 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

October 2014

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for confirmed sockpuppetry and admitted canvassing at an AfD discussion. Based on this behavior, I do not think that allowing you to edit in the future would not be advantageous to this project. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Kinu t/c 16:33, 19 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppet investigation

edit
 

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nandinigoel.india, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Seahorseruler (Talk Page) (Contribs) 23:11, 9 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Nandinigoel.jpg listed for deletion

edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nandinigoel.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:03, 6 October 2015 (UTC)Reply