Mwoofsh

February 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Normandy, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. The Normandy article is written in British English . All articles are written in a consistent English style - this one just happens to be in British English  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   10:42, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

You have no reason to Anglicize it. It was consistently North American. --Mwoofsh (talk) 11:08, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Edit summaries

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Vancouver does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Your reversion of my edit is without an edit summary. My changes to that image was based off MOS:IMGLOC (which dictates right orientation as the rule, with leftwards orientation used in certain exception). That said, I assume your edit was done to prevent stacking of the images rightward (staggering of images being an accepted exception). Basically just giving you the friendly reminder to use edit summaries for your edits next time. Thanks! Leventio (talk) 09:28, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Leventio- Very sorry. Forgive the stupid blunder. --Mwoofsh (talk) 09:46, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Your repeated addition of a press release on Liberland

Hello. I have seen the source provided, so you can stop pointing to it. It's a press release intended to promote Liberland, and does not belong in an encyclopaedia, only on Liberland's own website. Being a local representative for a fictional nation isn't notable, and doesn't belong here, especially when sourced only to Liberland themself. If a major news site picks up on it and makes a story of it, it might belong here, since we would then have a reliable source, independent of the subject, but we do not publish press releases unless they're about something really notable. Which this isn't, so stop adding it! - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 10:17, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Thomas.W- That's right. The press release is the source. Media is WP:RS and if you care to examine the website, you'll find that media companies (newspapers and TV news channels) are used to write the whole project. Obviously if you have any objections to this then you may raise them at Wikipedia talk:Reliable sources, and so any questions you may have can be answered there as well. So for now, I suggest you back away from that article thank you. --Mwoofsh (talk) 10:20, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Mwoofsh reported by User:Thomas.W (Result: ). Thank you. - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 10:56, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Youre *so* easy ...

... to both spot and trigger, Evlekis. - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 11:01, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Daniel Dabek

The article Daniel Dabek has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Created by VOA, already moved once into draft space and then moved out again. Complete non-entity.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ——SerialNumber54129 11:10, 28 February 2019 (UTC)