My edition(s) to Juliusz Kleiner on 7 Jan 2011 were not a vandalism, however I don't try to enforce restoring the deleted changes.

The woman mentioned in

"In 1940 and 1941, Juliusz Kleiner advocated for the release of a Polish woman who had been deported to a forced labour camp in Kazakhstan" 

was Stefania Skwarczyńska, mentioned also in the previous sentence; I tried to put these infos together, in the chronological order. Because of my little experience I made a mistake in the first edition: the (quoted here) sentence was not removed while its info was fully contained in the new above paragraph. Thus the difference between versions 18:42 and 18:45 appeared as an unreasonable deletion. The current version still contains this duplicate, as I did not dare to remove the duplicate again. If somebody is going to remove this duplicate, make sure not to delete the link 3 at "Kazakhstan" - rather move it up.

I also tried to make an external link to a web page of Skwarczyńska in Polish Wikipedia. ManicSpider converted it to a (not working) internal link, with mistyped its first part (still not working after spelling correction). Is this wrong to put the link to Polish Wikipedia? Many of people who read about Kleiner (even in English) can read in Polish and possibly they would like to read about Skwarczyńska.

The version I tried to create was prepared by the son of Juliusz Kleiner - this should be considered a "Historical source" of the info, including the words "his best scientific pupil".

If you want to make sure I will see your answer(s) promptly, please mail to uikleine AT cyf-kr.edu.pl (normally I check my watchlist monthly).

  • Hello! I think I see what you're trying to say here, and I'll go through and fix those links up. My problem was that your edits were a little confusing, especially when coupled with the edit summary "Pole; large contribution to national culture. By Hitler Nuremberg Law regarded a Jew. Publishing ethnic and race data is harmful to the progeny and inhibited by Polish law, to be respected in all EU". Regards, - ManicSpider (talk) 22:25, 13 January 2011 (UTC)Reply