User talk:Mujinga/archive twenty

Question from Jezzda (01:52, 1 May 2024)

Hello Mujinga, would you please explain the etiquette for modifying another editor's work? More specifically, if a user has added information without a source or with a source that doesn't appear to support the information. If a different editor can't find a suitable source for the previous user's information, is removing the information (and explaining the removal in the change log) a suitable remedy? What should an editor do if they suspect a citation request won't be actioned quickly? Should an editor leave the information and instead edit the language to ensure readers understand that the information is alleged/unconfirmed?

I'm sure much of this is would be on a case-by-case basis but I'm interested to know your thoughts. Thank you :) --Jezzda (talk) 01:52, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

@Jezzda welcome to wikipedia! there's quite a lot of questions there and indeed case by case is normally easier to discuss but happy to answer in broad terms as well (and look at specific examples later). Wikipedia is all about people being bold to make edits, so feel free to get involved, that's how we all started probably, wanting to fix something :) If someone disagrees and reverts your edit, the next step would be to discuss on the relevant talkpage and in the ideal case reach consensus, which I can't say always happens but it's nice when it does. Pretty much everything on wikipedia should be sourced, so you are welcoem to remove unsourced or badly sourced information. This is particularly true for articles about living people so that false or malicious information does not stay up long.

"If a different editor can't find a suitable source for the previous user's information, is removing the information (and explaining the removal in the change log) a suitable remedy?" - yes i would say so, it might be a trigger for a longer discussion and that's good, we all want to improve the encyclopedia.

"What should an editor do if they suspect a citation request won't be actioned quickly?" - if i put in a request for source, i would wait at least a week before removing the information, just to give others a chance to respond, but it really depends on context ... if it's libellous, don't wait ... if you know who added the info you could go to their talkpage to chat about it...

" Should an editor leave the information and instead edit the language to ensure readers understand that the information is alleged/unconfirmed?" I wuldn't edit the langauge no, i'd prob remove the statement or add a citation needed tag, using Template:Citation needed

Hope that helps, feel free to discuss more :) Normally I'll respond quicker but I was visiting friends these last days. Mujinga (talk) 16:24, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Question from Jezzda (08:39, 1 May 2024)

Hey Mujinga, so I only really learnt about and understood that Wikipedia has a 'Simple English' version today and almost made some very embarrassing mistakes without knowing that. I'd like to know whether the pages on 'Simple English' should be viewed as though it's any other language of Wikipedia or not. Should I copy over large amounts of text from the standard wiki and attempt to edit the language into a more readable format in-line with the 'Basic English' of Wikipedia's 'simple' version? --Jezzda (talk) 08:39, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

@Jezzda I cant really answer questions about the simple english wikipedia since each language wikipedia has its own conventions. From a quick look, I'd advise checking https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Contents. Plus don't worry, you are a beginner and you cannot definitely break anything since all changes can be rolled back, so noone will get cross. Happy editing! Mujinga (talk) 16:27, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Question from Bisonseek (12:50, 4 May 2024)

how will i come to know whether the article has some issue --Bisonseek (talk) 12:50, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

@Bisonseek hello! well there's lots of different ways to edit a wikipedia article, you might want to add information cited to a reliable source or correct a spelling mistake. i've put some helpful links for you at User talk:Bisonseek. happy editing! Mujinga (talk) 17:16, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

Question from Pedunculate (17:51, 5 May 2024)

hello, how do i correct a link please? --Pedunculate (talk) 17:51, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

@Pedunculate can you be more specific please? Mujinga (talk) 18:10, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

thank you for your reply; on the perse school wikipedia page under 'notable perseans' there is listed 'Matthew Lloyd, theatre director, Royal Exchange, Manchester'; however his name links to another Matthew Lloyd who is a football player in australia. please excuse lack of caitals; my keyboard seems to be broken. 2A01:CB19:7D8:8B00:A8FA:8517:2BF0:80A (talk) 18:18, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

@Pedunculate i think you must have forgotten to login? i see what you mean on Matthew Lloyd - since there is no theatre director listed at Matthew Lloyd (disambiguation) it's probably best simply to remove the entire reference to Lloyd at The Perse School unless you have a reliable source for the information. hope that helps. Mujinga (talk) 18:26, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

thank you, will do. Pedunculate (talk) 19:37, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Question from Dolphinnano1 (05:42, 6 May 2024)

I want to create an user page --Dolphinnano1 (talk) 05:42, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

@Dolphinnano1 hellos and welcome to wikipedia! if you click on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Dolphinnano1 when you are logged in, it will enable you to edit that page to your heart's desire. happy editing Mujinga (talk) 14:53, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Question from Scordier (15:22, 6 May 2024)

Hello! Can you give some tips to make citations?

Thank you for advance! --Scordier (talk) 15:22, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

@Scordier hiya! i just put some handy links at User talk:Scordier and to answer your question, Wikipedia:Citing sources lays it all out - it can be a bit overwhelming at first, but it quickly becomes second nature! Mujinga (talk) 15:47, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Question from Msouryadeepta (17:03, 9 May 2024)

Hey there, I have been trying to draft my first Wikipedia article and got rejected quite a lot of times for formats and views. Would you suggest me how is it different from an article? Suppose I am writing on a subject, what should I focus on more? Would love to know more about it. Thanks. --Msouryadeepta (talk) 17:03, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

@Msouryadeepta Sure, I'll get back to you after I've eaten! Mujinga (talk) 17:43, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Sure Mujinga! Will look forward to your response. Msouryadeepta (talk) 18:05, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

@Msouryadeepta hi again! So:

1 Draft:Souryadeepta Majumdar is presumably writing about yourself? Almost always a bad idea, since it's hard to be objective about your own achievements

2 Draft:Data_Driven_Astronomy - well, you have been given good advice alreasdy by two separate reviewers. Although you did add references, you didn't add them inline except in one case, whichn is unfortunate. To see how a wikipedia article should be referenced, let's look at Horned sungem, today's featured article, which means it is on the main page. Firstly you have the lead, the summary part, which doesnt need references becuase it summarises the article body, where all the claims are referenced. And under in the body, everything is referenced inline, for example The specimen originally illustrated by Temminck in 1820, now considered as the type specimen of the species, is part of the collection of the Naturalis Biodiversity Center in Leiden [5] with 5 being the link to the reference.

Does this help? Mujinga (talk) 20:37, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Well @Mujinga, this was exactly the specific guidance I was seeking as it wasnt clear on how I can shape the format and references to make it better. Surely, it does help! Thanks a lot for your support! Will sirely reach out for further queries if needed. Msouryadeepta (talk) 04:06, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

@Msouryadeepta That's good to hear, feel free to reach out with any other wikipedia-related queries, happy editing! Mujinga (talk) 07:37, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Question from LOFT MUZIVK (07:36, 10 May 2024)

Hi how can I upload my bio --LOFT MUZIVK (talk) 07:36, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

@LOFT MUZIVK that doesn't really sound like a good use of wikipedia? and as a buddy said up above, "if you're underage, you should read WP:YOUNG before writing anything about yourself at all" since it is a public website. I've put some helpful links at User talk:LOFT MUZIVK Mujinga (talk) 07:40, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

@Mujingau borinf LOFT MUZIVK (talk) 07:44, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

encyclopedias are great! Mujinga (talk) 07:51, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Question from Mr. Vikash Thakur (19:30, 11 May 2024)

hi mujinga, i want to submit new article, can you help me? --Mr. Vikash Thakur (talk) 19:30, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Mr. Vikash Thakur, you could make a draft in your userspace following the form of User talk:Mr. Vikash Thakur/YOURNEWDRAFT, then link me to it, then we can discuss Mujinga (talk) 08:21, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

please check draft article and update if needed.. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Mr._Vikash_Thakur/YOURNEWDRAFT Mr. Vikash Thakur (talk) 12:58, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

Question from Mistake Mack (13:40, 12 May 2024)

Hello i've made some edits to the Dunbar High School (Washington, D.C.) Notable alumni section adding William Montague Cobb to he lsit of Scholars and professionals. If your free l was wondering if you could look over it --Mistake Mack (talk) 13:40, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

@Mistake Mack cool, i'll take a look tomoro! Mujinga (talk) 17:03, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

Sorry i have internet issues now Mujinga (talk) 17:15, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

Sorry for the delay @Mistake Mack, on a quick look it seems you have mastered wikipedia editing already well done!! Feel free to be bold, it's a pillar of wikipedia and don't worry everything is reversible so you can't really break stuff. Happy editing! Mujinga (talk) 10:21, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

please check draft article and update if needed..

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Mr._Vikash_Thakur/YOURNEWDRAFT Mr. Vikash Thakur (talk) 15:02, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

@Mr. Vikash Thakur will do! probably tomorrow Mujinga (talk) 17:02, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for update, please check if possible. Mr. Vikash Thakur (talk) 15:09, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

Sorry i have internet issues now Mujinga (talk) 17:15, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

okay, really i need your help Mr. Vikash Thakur (talk) 17:26, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

@Mr. Vikash Thakur hiya the article is not bad for a first attempt, well done you!! it probably would not in my opinion pass through the Wikipedia:Articles for creation process yet, which is where this is headed, with a bit more work first I think it'll be good-to-go.

At first I was sceptical because there are a lot of purely promotional article attempts on wikipedia, but this guy does seem notable on wikipedia standards because he does have significant coverage in reliable sources. The inman and entrepreneur sources are decent, and I found on a quick look this source saying he was 2023 Commencement speaker at Luther which would be worth adding. I'll put some comments now ... Mujinga (talk) 10:11, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

1 Do you know the subject of the article? If you do, that's not necessarily a problem but it should be disclosed, following Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest#howtodisclose

2 WP:PROMO is also worth a read, although so far I think you have steered clear of being overly promotional

3 Right now the article is quite well sourced, but the "Early life and education" section has no sources. As a rough rule of thumb, every paragraph in the article body should have at least one citation on it

4 Despite 3, the article lead tends not to need citations, since it should only be summarising information cited below in the article body. Does that make sense?

5 There appear to be many iterations of Luther College so please specify which one you mean if you click through the link.

6 The Forbes and CNBC links aren't great and could be replaced with better ones.

Let me know if you have further questions and/or head on over to Wikipedia:Articles for creation!

Happy editing Mujinga (talk) 10:17, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for confirming i have updated links, please check this article has been submitted for approval or not. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mr._Vikash_Thakur/Sharran_Srivatsaa

if not submitted please guide me how to submit draft article for approval.. Mr. Vikash Thakur (talk) 18:10, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

I was suggesting you go through Wikipedia:Articles for creation - Mujinga (talk) 20:25, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

Ah now I see you have published it, well done. Other editors have made comments and you can use this feedback to improve the page Mujinga (talk) 20:33, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

yes, thank you for your support. Now this is live but why this is not visible in google ranking.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sharran_Srivatsaa Mr. Vikash Thakur (talk) 15:12, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi, please check talk page is this fine? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Sharran_Srivatsaa Mr. Vikash Thakur (talk) 15:31, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

@Mr. Vikash Thakur yeah talkpage looks fine, i just removed some unneeded brackets Mujinga (talk) 10:20, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Question from DeepnessSky (06:58, 14 May 2024)

How do I fix an error in the format column:

List_of_digital_television_channels_in_Australia

There are 3 radio stations that are Mono instead of Stereo:

25 ABC Sydney 26 ABC RN 204 ABC NewsRadio

I don't know how to do this. --DeepnessSky (talk) 06:58, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi @DeepnessSky first step would be to know if you have a reference from a reliable source for this change? It can be hard to get one's head around at first, but wikipedia needs to be verifiable, so even if you know something to be true, you need to "prove it" with a reference so others can check it. Wikipedia:Verifiability covers this in more detail. Cheers! Mujinga (talk) 10:19, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Assault of Ermyas Mulugeta

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Assault of Ermyas Mulugeta you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grnrchst -- Grnrchst (talk) 11:21, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

@Grnrchst oh that's a nice surprise! my internets have gone down this week so I'm having to pop out for wifi, but I am around, lookig forward to collaborating again :) Mujinga (talk) 12:00, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

Question from Bugzy Does Research (21:37, 15 May 2024)

what if a suggested edit article seems to be good to start with? --Bugzy Does Research (talk) 21:37, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

@Bugzy Does Research onto the next one! Mujinga (talk) 18:38, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

Women in Green GA Editathon June 2024 - Going Back in Time

Hello Mujinga:

WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long Good Article Edit-a-thon event in June 2024!

Running from June 1 to 30, 2024, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme Going Back in Time! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least 20 centuries by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.

We hope to see you there!

You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:12, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

Question from Gvno (22:32, 16 May 2024)

Hi thank you so much! I need help to create a wikipedia page for my boss at work --Gvno (talk) 22:32, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Gvno in most cases that would be a bad idea, since you have a clear conflict of interest. i suggest giving WP:COI a read first Mujinga (talk) 15:53, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

Question from Macarius Ibne Mito (06:58, 17 May 2024)

Hello, how do I put a book as a citation? --Macarius Ibne Mito (talk) 06:59, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

@Macarius Ibne Mito great question! i tend to use Template:Cite book, maybe give that whirl! Mujinga (talk) 15:52, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

Thanks, for helping, I knew how to put a citation, but I didn’t have much experience in citing books. Macarius Ibne Mito (talk) 16:03, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

Always something to learn on wikipedia :) Mujinga (talk) 15:27, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

Question from Sinovuyo CeeJay Mfana (08:39, 19 May 2024)

Hi, how can I add more biography on my wikipedia page ? --Sinovuyo CeeJay Mfana (talk) 08:39, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

You mean your own biography? Well you have a userpage at User:Sinovuyo CeeJay Mfana but remember that is a public facing page so you may want to think about how much information you want to add to it. Mujinga (talk) 22:06, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

Question from Sinovuyo CeeJay Mfana (08:42, 19 May 2024)

Hello. How do I create Citation ? --Sinovuyo CeeJay Mfana (talk) 08:42, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

@Sinovuyo CeeJay Mfana hiya i tend to use templates such as Template:Cite book. Lemme know if you need a hand! Mujinga (talk) 22:05, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

Question from DLPLCHP on ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 (22:00, 19 May 2024)

Please my gmb phone no approve --DLPLCHP (talk) 22:00, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

? Mujinga (talk) 22:04, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

Question from PATRICK KWIZERA (06:53, 23 May 2024)

Hello am PATRICK KWIZERA I wanna know how to edit my Wikipedia --PATRICK KWIZERA (talk) 06:53, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

@PATRICK KWIZERA I'll put some helpful links on your talkpage here - User_talk:PATRICK_KWIZERA. Have fun editing!! Mujinga (talk) 09:46, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red June 2024

Women in Red | June 2024, Volume 10, Issue 6, Numbers 293, 294, 308, 309, 310 Online events: New: LGBTQ+ women | Wiki Loves Pride | Women in Music | Alphabet run X, Y & Z Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative) Announcements from other communities Women in Green Good Article Edit-a-thon June 2024 - Going Back in Time The Wikipedia Library: #1Lib1Ref - May 15th to June 5th Tip of the month: Find a Grave is NOT a reliable source (as it is user-generated content). It can be used to look for biographical clues. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 07:05, 23 May 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Question from Royal Natalia Luccia (08:39, 23 May 2024)

H£|_|_Œ !!

     I'M Royal Natalia! Pleasure to interact with you!!
           ...How do you create a citation? As well why do you create a citation as private information? Especially if it shows that it is publicly private? --Royal Natalia Luccia (talk) 08:39, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

@Royal Natalia Luccia hello - i put some links at User talk:Royal Natalia Luccia. To create a citation you can use a template such as Template:Cite book. Why create citations? To back up the assertion. It is not private information, anyone can see it by editing the page. Hope that helps! Mujinga (talk) 09:49, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

Thank you! Royal Natalia Luccia (talk) 21:00, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Assault of Ermyas Mulugeta

The article Assault of Ermyas Mulugeta you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Assault of Ermyas Mulugeta for comments about the article, and Talk:Assault of Ermyas Mulugeta/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grnrchst -- Grnrchst (talk) 11:01, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

Question from Joseph.programmer (12:28, 28 May 2024)

Hello mentor: Does W. editing mean the power to modify, delete or add a sentence? Even adding technical philosophical, mathematical, scientific or computer terminology? Thanks. --Joseph.programmer (talk) 12:28, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

@Joseph.programmer hi yes that's one way of putting it! i'll put some helpful links for you at User talk:Joseph.programmer. happy editing! Mujinga (talk) 14:00, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

Thanks Mujinga.

Honestly it is exciting to join your team. But also a bit stressful. Since it is new. Though I use Wikipedia a lot. Joseph.programmer (talk) 14:21, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

@Joseph.programmer editing wikipedia is so much fun because there is always so much to learn! Mujinga (talk) 14:31, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

Thanks! Joseph.programmer (talk) 14:35, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

Question from Mr. Vikash Thakur (04:29, 2 June 2024)

Hello, I need your help urgently. i have submit a draft article for approval but this was removed by team and received a massage on my talk... i have receive this massage "Hello Mr. Vikash Thakur. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Juego Studios, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Mr. Vikash Thakur. The template

can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:

. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Sam Kuru --Mr. Vikash Thakur (talk) 04:29, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

@Mr. Vikash Thakur that's a standard message concerning a conflict of interest, which long-standing editor Kuru thinks you have. How to progress? Well, like you have done, by replying. You've said you are "not receiving any compensation for my edits on Wikipedia" but can i clarify, do you have a connection of any kind to Juego Studios? It's ok if you do, but then it should be declared, as the message indicates. I can't se the draft, which has been deleted for being promotional. This means it doesn't meet the wikipedia standards ... to take it the other way round, an article needs to be reliably sourced (Wikipedia:Reliable sources)and written from a neutral point of view (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view). Maybe give them a read. By all means carry on editing! Mujinga (talk) 08:49, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for replying. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Mr._Vikash_Thakur/YOURNEWDRAFT

this is draft article, kindly check how we can improve this article. Mr. Vikash Thakur (talk) 10:15, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

@Mr. Vikash Thakur sure, I'll take a look, I'll prob have to do it in a few chunks since my internet time is limited over the next days Mujinga (talk) 10:19, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Also did you look at the links I supplied? Mujinga (talk) 10:19, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your support(I am very thank full), please suggest me now what can i do.. Now this is fine we can go for approval? Mr. Vikash Thakur (talk) 17:56, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

oh no it needs more work first! i haven't had time to look again yet. Mujinga (talk) 10:10, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

gave it another read, it does still seem promotional unfortunately Mujinga (talk) 17:38, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Question from Corny Copia (14:28, 3 June 2024)

Thanks. I was not sure how to make an addition to the list of notables from Hamburg, Iowa. All of the other entries seemed to have used a lot of [ ] sort of things? --Corny Copia (talk) 14:28, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Hiya are we talking about Hamburg,_Iowa#Notable_people? In a list such as that, entries would be expected to have a blue link not a red link, that is to say an already existing wiki article about them and ideally a citation too. When making an edit, on wiki we use xx where xx is the name to code a link to the article in question. And that gives a redlink since there is no page for xx. Hope that makes sense! I'll put some links at User talk:Corny Copia, happy editing! Mujinga (talk) 20:09, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Question from Abdirahman Nurre on Talk:Adado (11:23, 4 June 2024)

Cadaado waa magaalada ugu Amniga badan Guud ahaan Somalia

The Blue City of Somalia --Abdirahman Nurre (talk) 11:23, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

@Abdirahman Nurre hellos what's the question?? Mujinga (talk) 10:11, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Question from Blckbelt on Objecteering (01:52, 10 June 2024)

Hello mentor!

For content written like an advertisement...I agree an article like this one "Objecteering" is written this way. I'm not sure how much to edit out of it. Should I replace the "key features" section with a more general view of the product?

I see many like this and want to be sure what I am doing before I start editing them.

Thanks! --Blckbelt (talk) 01:52, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Blckbelt and welcome to wikipedia! Yes Objecteering is in a terrible state, so much so that the essay Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over could be said to apply. Looking at it in terms of wikipedia guidelines (rather than an essay), the article needs to be sourced to significant coverage in reliable sources and the only citation is in the lead (the first bit). The overview and key features are completely uncited and therefore could be removed. It's ok to be bold on wikipedia, in fact it's encouraged. Any edit can be rolled back, so feel free to get stuck in! Mujinga (talk) 10:17, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

Thanks so much. You have inspired me. I'm happy to contribute. Blckbelt (talk) 02:10, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Great, happy editing! Mujinga (talk) 11:01, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Question from ChrisO1974 (04:35, 16 June 2024)

Hello --ChrisO1974 (talk) 04:35, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

@ChrisO1974 hi there any wikipedia-related questions? i've put some infos at User talk:ChrisO1974 Mujinga (talk) 09:41, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Question from SAMfeb132003 (06:29, 20 June 2024)

how to create a page --SAMfeb132003 (talk) 06:29, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

@SAMfeb132003 you did the right thing following the Wikipedia:Articles for creation process, but as the feedback at Draft:St._Anthony_Montessori said you need to use citations based on reliable sources. Let me know if I can help further with anything wikipedia related! Mujinga (talk) 08:35, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

FA

@Mujinga, Present sentence: "..became an MP for the Samajwadi Party. .." Suggestion: Using full form of MP 'Member of Parliament' that likely to be important to international audience then her Political party's name on main page I suppose.

Not being aware of procedure to participating in FA discussion sharing my suggestion here. Happy editing Bookku (talk) 07:51, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

@Bookku you'd be welcome to make suggestions at the page you linked! I agree using MP feels clunky in the blurb, but there's a tight word limit and I have already used full form and linked to Member of Parliament, Lok Sabha in the first sentence. Mujinga (talk) 10:38, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

Oh sorry I didn't notice first sentence itself, my observation loss. Anyways I got to know I can join such discussions there and could chat with you by my mistake though.:) Happy editing. Bookku (talk) 11:54, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

Question from Engineer-1024 (08:00, 23 June 2024)

I am interested in publishing an article. I am a degreed and experienced software engineer. I own the McPherran Web Engine and codepages.net. I invented a programming approach called FOO (function-oriented with objects). (Perhaps, you've heard of object-oriented programming, FOO is a bit different). I would like to publish an article about it. Currently, I created the article as a user page but I don't know how to change the title or turn it into an article. I am also happy to have it reviewed first so that I can polish it as needed and do whatever else needs to be done. Thank You! --Engineer-1024 (talk) 08:00, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Engineer-1024, thanks for stopping by! It appears you have a confliit of interest here, which is not necessarily a problem since you have followed the first step detailed at Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide, ie to declare it. So if you follow the other steps, that's probably best. And if you put the article into the Wikipedia:Articles for creation process you'll get feedback - don't do that yet though since every claim on wikipedia needs to be cited to reliable sources and right now most of the article appears uncited, even if there are sources listed at the end. A rough rule of thumb is one cite per paragraph. Hope that helps and happy editing! Mujinga (talk) 10:07, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

OK, thank you Mujinga,

As far as conflict of interest, I'm not aware of any that I have. In my field of work, I simply select the tools and methods that are most helpful, with absolutely no bias. So this article is a reflection of that an nothing more. For example, I have used both C and C++ over decades of time and I have even been a proponent of C++ in the past even though I prefer C now. The methodology (FOO) can be used with C++ and other programming languages, not only C.

Your information is astute and intelligent. Wikipedia's thoroughness is a good thing.

I sincerely thank you for your time on this and am grateful for the professional guidance on how to proceed.

Have a wonderful day! Engineer-1024 (talk) 23:39, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

@Mujinga, a note regarding conflict of interest. I only mentioned the McPherran Web Engine as an example of my qualifications to provide a professional opinion in my field of work, the web engine doesn't relate directly to my article about FOO. However, I can also see that because I have a website where I promote my FOO methodology, that could be considered a conflict of interest. Yet, even with that I am sincere in providing my professional opinion that my methodology FOO is truly important helpful in my field.

Perhaps, if someone else finds FOO interesting and would like to publish an article, I can provide them any information that they would like.

Thank You again, Greg McPherran Engineer-1024 (talk) 00:14, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

Well you are Greg McPherran, you said above you own the McPherran Web Engine and at User:Engineer-1024/Sample page you say "The FOO approach was codified by Gregory McPherran in 2024" so in wikipedia terms that's a clear conflict of interest. re "Perhaps, if someone else finds FOO interesting and would like to publish an article, I can provide them any information that they would like" honestly this is probably a better idea, you could ask for help at the Wikipedia:Teahouse or a relevant wikiproject, perhaps Wikipedia:WikiProject Computing. Good luck! Mujinga (talk) 17:54, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

OK, thank you Mujinga Engineer-1024 (talk) 23:21, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

Question from Prempy (15:15, 26 June 2024)

hello pls how do i upload images in an article --Prempy (talk) 15:15, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

@Prempy Hello and welcome to wikipedia! Wikipedia:Images covers use of images on wikipedia - the important thing to be aware of with any upload of an image is its copyright provenance. do yohave a specific image in mind? Mujinga (talk) 07:54, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

FAC review request

HI! I really appreciated your taking the time to help review Maria Trubnikova for FA earlier this year. I nominated Nadezhda Stasova, an article about another member of the Russian feminist "triumvirate" for FAC review a month ago and it's been going through the process. However, it's only attracted 2 full reviewers and an image review so far, and though all 3 editors supported, I'm worried it'll get archived soon without another reviewer taking a look and helping develop a broader consensus. Do you have any time to comment on the article soon? If not, no worries of course, but if you do, thank you! —Ganesha811 (talk) 13:21, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for dropping by, I hadn't seen Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Nadezhda Stasova/archive1. My online time is quite limited at the moment so I don't think I'll get there, but there seem to be a few more reviews now which is great. Good luck with it! Mujinga (talk) 18:04, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Appreciate you taking a look. Happy editing! —Ganesha811 (talk) 02:25, 1 July 2024 (UTC)