Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:10, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
- How is it not constructive? My edited made perfect sense. Kat Bailey personal opinion has nothing to do with the Ratings and Reception of the event itself. Mrlambert12 (talk) 22:29, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
- All of the other reviews represent someone's person opinion. Singling out a review you don't like is disruptive. OhNoitsJamie Talk 23:08, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
- I am curious did you write out the article or are you just a moderator? Anyways I am trying to genuine here. The reason I am singling it out because contrarian opinions seem completely out of place for the general discussion of the event. The discussion of the event should include examples of the opinions(negative or positive) that most critics and audiences felt about the event during the time. I am sorry but the opinion of a couple of critics who hated Gladiator and didn't think it deserved best picture is not relevant to the discussion of what most audiences and critics felt about the 73rd Oscars. Mrlambert12 (talk) 04:49, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
- I am very puzzled on how my arguments for my reasoning to remove sources is not constructive and is considered disruption. It seems like you have a dog in this fight which is baffling to me. This is not a scientific, historical or mathematical article its just award show event so there is more leeway on what is valid and what is not. Its not the individual review that's the problem per se its that the review is complete outlier among most critics and gamers. Its out completely out place and doesn't belong in a general overview about what most critics and gamers felt about the awards. Mrlambert12 (talk) 19:38, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
- You are free to propose changes to the article at Talk:The Game Awards 2020 and seek a consensus for removing the content, but as of now, you haven't provided a valid reason as to why we'd single out a particular review for exclusion, especially one from a notable source. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:56, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
- All of the other reviews represent someone's person opinion. Singling out a review you don't like is disruptive. OhNoitsJamie Talk 23:08, 6 May 2022 (UTC)