MrFizyx
 | This user may have left Wikipedia. MrFizyx has not edited Wikipedia since 12 December 2013. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
|style="border:3px solid black;" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" align="center" |style="background:#76CCFF"|Please leave new messages at the BOTTOM of this page. |}
| Please leave a . |
Regarding the deletion of Mindy Gledhill. Mindy Gledhill's single "Crazy Love" was released in Korea recently. It charted at #1 on the Pop chart for Bugs music (an equivalent to the itunes pop chart in the US). [1] Wouldn't this in addition to her winning several pearl awards make her a notable musician? Note: she further features on three tracks on a Billboard Top 200 charting album by DJ Kaskade. Waytagojoe (talk) 04:16, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
- Hi I missed your note the other day. You should have posted it in the debate rather than on my page after the debate ended! I'm not familiar with that chart and can't comment on it's notability. I don't know if her contributions to Kaskade's record make her notable, not every musician who contributes to an notable album is necessarily notable. The issue as I see it, is that there has been very little written about her elsewhere. Find a few published articles about her specifically and you'll have a good basis for an article and can try again. -MrFizyx (talk) 14:17, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Three Fishers edit
 | On 15 April 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Three Fishers, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that when Antoinette Sterling sang the English folk song "Three Fishers" in the late 1800s, she made the first verse "quite bright" so as not to give away the unhappy ending? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
Re: Song lists edit
It's going to be a lot to take on, but I'll snag them for as long as I can. Have you asked other editors to claim them? ----DanTD (talk) 03:45, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
whoops edit
You may see a rollback (which I've then self-reverted) on one of your AFD contributions. That was a simple finger slip, sorry for any confusion. --joe deckertalk to me 19:15, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
Peter Buck Atheist edit
The subject is closed. What does it have to offer to the Wiki?--BuddyOfHolly (talk) 04:25, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
User:MrFizyx/List of notable folk & roots music albums edit
Do you still plan on doing anything with User:MrFizyx/List of notable folk & roots music albums? You haven't touched it in 4 years. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 20:41, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
MfD nomination of User:MrFizyx/List of notable folk & roots music albums edit
User:MrFizyx/List of notable folk & roots music albums, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:MrFizyx/List of notable folk & roots music albums and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:MrFizyx/List of notable folk & roots music albums during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 03:15, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
The Rough Guide to Blues 100 Essential CDs edit
hello,
do you still have this book? If yes, could you say how they felt about At Newport 1960, and maybe quoting some quotes? Not compelling, but nice to feature some more text. Thanks.--♫GoP♫TCN 11:46, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
- I am sorry, but I no longer have access to the resource I used. I this particular case, I only had access to an online resource with scans of the table of contents. I never read the commentary, but did confirm that this CD was one of 100 included by the authors of the book. -MrFizyx (talk) 04:29, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Mankita Dogs.jpg edit
Thanks for uploading File:Mankita Dogs.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:20, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
MfD nomination of User:MrFizyx/Music resources edit
User:MrFizyx/Music resources, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:MrFizyx/Music resources and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:MrFizyx/Music resources during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 07:35, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
Category:Kerrville New Folk Competition finalists edit
Category:Kerrville New Folk Competition finalists, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 06:21, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
The article Tito Auger has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Only one reference; subject may not meet WP:N or WP:CREATIVE
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Parson's Cat (talk) 17:19, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Ellis (singer-songwriter) for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ellis (singer-songwriter) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ellis (singer-songwriter) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 22:53, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
A page you started (This Land Is My Land) has been reviewed! edit
Thanks for creating This Land Is My Land.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Nice work!
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MainlyTwelve}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
MainlyTwelve (talk) 04:02, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
The file File:Shindell R.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
The article Corinne West has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. John from Idegon (talk) 14:55, 20 December 2019 (UTC)