Mohylek
){kind=link}
Welcome, from Journalist edit
Welcome!
Hello, Mohylek, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
How to delete edit
Now you'll be able to nominate stuff yourself for deletion. Link to User:Brendanconway/AFD for instructions. This is for standard deletions. Speedy deletions on the other hand - criteria at Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion. For speedy deletion put [{{db|(reason)}] (just whats between brackets) at top of page. Have many happy hours deleting.--File Éireann 22:43, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
Savour the chance to vote at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ibox!--File Éireann 22:55, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
Przez przypadek trafiłem na Twoją uwagę. U mnie na monitorze widać zieleń (ciemna), a nie czerń. Może to wina monitorów, ze się różnie wyświetla. Od jakiegoś czasu zabieram się za poprawienie tej grafiki (wiadukt na Batorego jest źle poprowadzony, plus legendę i skalę trzeba dodać), to poprawie może na inną zieleń :). Na razie brak mi czasu i wyleciał mi z komputera program, do edytowania svg. Jakbyś chciał poedytować tą grafikę, to źródło jest tutaj: commons:Image talk:Zielona Góra - plan.png. Kotasik 19:34, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
Image:Poznan Poland.jpg edit
This is an excellent photograph. Is it ok for this image to be a selected article at the architecture portal? DVD+ R/W 21:44, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
- I'm pleased to hear that. Of, course, do whatever you please. If you need the pic in a better resolution contact me at " omasz @ centrum.cz " or leave your e-mail here Mohylek 23:42, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
Image deleted edit
Hello!
I delete your photo http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Kubek.JPG and added to commons: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Mug_Kubek.JPG
I wish if you upp more photos to wikipedia will be on commons instead of a single language wikipedia, please.
Bye!
PD: i haven't a user in the en:wikipedia, but in the spanish wikipedia is: http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usuario:Cels PD: sorry by my poor english.
Image source problem with Image:Breznak.gif edit
This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Breznak.gif. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:42, 13 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 21:42, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Primator.gif) edit
){kind=link}
Thanks for uploading Image:Primator.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:40, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Herold.gif edit
Thanks for uploading Image:Herold.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:24, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
NowCommons: File:Metrobudowa.jpg edit
File:Metrobudowa.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Metro Prague Construction Works Prosek.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Metro Prague Construction Works Prosek.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 21:41, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
|
Hello and welcome Mohylek! Thank you for your contributions related to Poland. You may be interested in visiting Portal:Poland/Poland-related Wikipedia notice board, joining our discussions and sharing your creations with our community. |
Speedy deletion nomination of Březňák edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Březňák requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Prof. Mc (talk) 13:36, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Březňák edit
The article Březňák has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No clear significance.
No links to external sources showing significance. In five years no expansion of article beyond a single sentence.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Prof. Mc (talk) 18:00, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit
Hello, Mohylek. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
The article Dačický has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No evidence this product passes WP:NCOMPANY/GNG. BEFORE does not show anything but mentions in passing. No valid redirect/merge target (not mentioned in any article outside see also section; no referenced content to merge, redirect to Heineken goes against WP:R#ASTONISH).
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:21, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dačický until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 00:52, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
The file File:Czechbeers.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Orphaned image. Derivative of a three-dimensional piece of art. Would need a license from the artist of the original artwork to keep.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ★ Bigr Tex 01:21, 29 November 2020 (UTC)