User talk:Mnj02/West Greenlandic

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Chuck Haberl in topic Final Review

Hey! For the West Greenlandic article, I’d definitely suggest a structure of the language section, as well as more information on the mixed trade language mentioned in the last part of the history section. Also, is the language endangered? If so, what is replacing it? In the history section, Danish is mentioned alongside regional dialects of Greenlandic. Is Danish another regional dialect? If it’s not, it’s not entirely relevant for an article on Greenlandic. The bit in the history that mentions West Greenlandic being nearly identical to modern Greenlandic- is West Greenlandic not modern or standard? The language map in the little chart to the right is interesting; Greenlandic being related to Inuit is a fascinating bit of knowledge. Overall, I’d add more mentions in the lead that are intended to be in the article, such as useable and maybe linguistic structure.

Final Review edit

Hi Meena, this is my feedback for your final project. As a reminder, the 6 points on which I'm grading you are Language, Structure, Balance, Accuracy, Relevance, and Length. Here are my assessments on each of those areas:

  1. Language: On the whole, the article employs proper English spelling and grammar. 5 points.
  2. Structure: The article follows the suggested template. 5 points.
  3. Balance: At present, the article appears to reflect a neutral point of view. 5 points.
  4. Accuracy: Most of the claims are backed by references to the scholarly literature. 5 points.
  5. Relevance: Nearly all of the information is relevant to the subject. 5 points.
  6. Length: Word count 1340/2000 (including headers but not bibliography). 3 points.

The final score is 28/30. Have a great summer! Chuck Haberl (talk) 22:15, 12 May 2021 (UTC)Reply